The Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office has taken two decisions this Wednesday (25 March 2015) highly anticipated by the agrochemical industry in the case Tomatoes II (G 0002/12) and Broccoli II (G 0002/13). The Board held that a patent application for a plant or plant material (such as a part of a plant or fruit) - not limited to a plant variety - could not be refused on the ground that this plant or that plant material would (only) come from an essentially biological process. Under article 53 b) of the European Patent Convention an essentially biological process is namely not patentable. A patent application for a product can only be examined on the basis of conditions for this class of inventions and not by taking into account considerations related to process patents. These two decisions raise some of the uncertainty that prevailed for more than a decade as to the object of patents on plants in favor of patent applicants.
Tomatoes II (G 0002/12) and Broccoli II (G 0002/13): European Patent Office’s decisions
More News & Articles
Show News & Articles →If it's AI, say so: new transparency rules upcoming
The AI Act's transparency obligations under Article 50 become applicable on 2 August 2026, requiring clear disclosure when individuals interact with A…
The AI Act's Transparency Obligations: Rules, Scope and Timeline
On 20 July 2026, the European Commission adopted guidelines on the transparency obligations for certain AI systems under Article 50 of the AI Act. The…
EMEA: Trade Secrets Under Pressure in the AI Landscape
EU trade-secret disputes still mostly arise with employees and other insiders who already have access. Hybrid work and generative AI increase leakage …
Don't miss anything
Get the latest legal jobs, events and news every week.