European SPC Waiver for Export and Stockpiling of Generics and Biosimilars
29/03/2019

On 14 February 2019, the Committee of the Permanent Representatives of the Governments of the Member States (Coreper) endorsed a draft regulation which introduces an exception to the protection granted to a medicinal product by a supplementary protection certificate (SPC) for export purposes and/or stockpiling. Next step is submission to the European Parliament and Council for adoption.
 

The draft EU regulation

An SPC is a right that seeks to compensate innovative pharmaceutical companies for the patent time lost during the period required to obtain approval to market a novel drug. Under the exception introduced by the draft regulation, which amends Regulation 469/2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products, EU-based manufacturers of generics and biosimilars will be entitled, during the term of the SPC, to manufacture a generic or biosimilar version of an SPC-protected medicinal product:
  • either for the purpose of exporting to a non-EU market where patent protection of the original medicinal product has expired or never existed
     
  • or for the purpose of creating a stock that will be put on the EU market after the SPC has expired; in this case, the exception can be relied on no earlier than 6 months prior to expiry of the SPC.


The export and stockpiling waiver will only apply where:

  • the manufacturer has provided the information required by the draft regulation, to both the authorities of the Member Sate of production and to the SPC holder at least three months in advance prior to manufacturing; this information includes an indication of the purpose of the manufacturing (export, stockpiling or both) and an indication of the Member State where the manufacture or stockpiling is to take place; and
  • the manufacturer has duly informed any person in a contractual relationship with it and involved in commercialization of the generic or biosimilar that the product is covered by the export and stockpiling waiver and that the placing on the market, import or re-import of the product could infringe the SPC where, and as long as, it applies.

Finally, in the case of products manufactured for the purpose of export to non-EU countries, the waiver shall only apply where the manufacturer has affixed to the packaging of the product a specific logo provided for by the regulation indicating clearly that it is only for export.

Until a given date (three years from the entry into force of the regulation), the regulation will affect only SPCs applied for on or after the date of its entry into force. Subsequently, the regulation will also affect SPCs applied for prior to its entry into force but which become effective afterwards.


Background to the new rules

The draft regulation aims to remove the competitive disadvantages faced by EU-based manufacturers of generics and biosimilars, compared to manufacturers established outside the EU, on global markets by allowing them to make in the EU medicinal products intended for export to third-country markets where protection does not exist or has expired, thereby helping them compete more effectively on those markets.

Indeed, as stated in Recital 4 to the draft regulation “the absence of any exception in Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 to the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate has had the unintended consequence of preventing makers of generics and biosimilars established in the Union to enter the Union market immediately after expiry of the SPC, given that they are not in a position to build up production capacity for export and for the purpose of entering the market of a Member State until the protection provided by the SPC has expired, by contrast with makers located in third countries where protection does not exist or has expired”.


Industry reaction

The proposed regulation has been criticised by the innovative bioindustries sector. EuropaBio Secretary General, Joanna Dupont-Inglis, commented as follows:

“The revision of the EU IP framework, to introduce a SPC manufacturing waiver, is a regrettable example of well-meant but, ultimately, counterproductive policy making, with far-reaching negative impacts on EU competitiveness. It is the small healthcare biotech companies, which are at the cutting edge of creating innovative technologies addressing patient’s unmet needs, that will be hardest hit. 
These companies, seeking treatments for some of our most devastating and difficult to tackle diseases, take the highest financial risks and rely heavily on investors’ money, often without making any profits for years. They are, therefore, critically dependent on a robust and predictable IP framework.”.

Similar concerns were voiced by the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries, that notes that “[t]he proposed SPC manufacturing waiver’s impact on innovative companies and R&D investment has not been properly assessed by the legislator. Moreover, there is data suggesting that it is doubtful the waiver will manage to achieve its intended purpose: support European generic and biosimilar manufacturers to compete on a level playing-field outside of the EU.”

On the other hand, Medicines for Europe, which represents the pharmaceutical companies supplying the largest share of medicines across Europe and is the voice of the generic, biosimilar and value-added industries, while regretting that the manufacturing waiver includes “unnecessary and redundant notification requirements” considers that “the SPC manufacturing waiver will contribute to better patient access, to create manufacturing opportunity and jobs and to increase Europe’s capacity to manufacture and supply its own medicines. Medicines for Europe thanks the EU for addressing many of its proposals for a comprehensive waiver including the possibility to manufacture for export and day 1 launch and a balanced date of applicability”.


Next legislative steps

The draft will now be submitted for formal adoption to the European Parliament and Council. The text is scheduled to be examined on first reading at the European Parliament’s plenary session to be held on 15 April 2019.


Anne Marie Verschuur
Vincent Wellens

Voir aussi : NautaDutilh ( Mrs. Christel Brion ,  Mrs. Florence Verhoestraete )

Mrs. Christel Brion Mrs. Christel Brion
Senior Associate
christel.brion@nautadutilh.com
Mrs. Florence Verhoestraete Mrs. Florence Verhoestraete
Partner
florence.verhoestraete@nautadutilh.com

Click here to see the ad(s)
Tous les articles Droit Européen

Derniers articles Droit Européen

La nouvelle Directive SET entre en vigueur le 18 avril 2019
19/04/2019

Le 18 avril 2019, la nouvelle Directive (UE) 2019/520 du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 19 mars 2019 «&n...

La nouvelle Directive SET entre en vigueur le 18 avril 2019 Read more

EU publishes guidelines on the ethical use of artificial intelligence
18/04/2019

The European Union has published a series of guidelines last week to guide companies and governments in developing et...

Read more

Nike ned EUR 12.5 million by Commission for imposing cross-border sales restrictions on its cont...
09/04/2019

The Commission has established that Nike’s non-exclusive licensing and distribution agreements breached article 101 ...

Read more

EU Advocate General gives Internet cookie opinion that could impact data privacy regs
03/04/2019

Advocate General Maciej Szpunar, a senior legal adviser to the EUs Court of Justice (CJEU), delivered an opinion (Case C?6...

EU Advocate General gives Internet cookie opinion that could impact data privacy regs Read more

Derniers articles de Mrs. Christel Brion

CJEU Denies SPC for Medical Devices Incorporating an Ancillary Active Ingredient
10/01/2019

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) recently ruled that, unlike medicinal products, medical devices incorpor...

Read more

CJEU Denies SPC for Medical Devices Incorporating an Ancillary Active Ingredient
21/12/2018

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) recently ruled that, unlike medicinal products, medical devices incorpor...

Read more

Bill to Align Belgian Patent Law to the UPC Agreement
26/12/2017

Although Brexit has called into question the future of the unitary patent and the Unified Patent Court, the Belgian legisl...

Read more

Court of Justice Finds Prescription-support Software to Be a Medical Device
19/12/2017

On 7 December 2017, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that to the extent software constitutes a medi...

Read more

Derniers articles de Mrs. Florence Verhoestraete

CJEU Denies SPC for Medical Devices Incorporating an Ancillary Active Ingredient
10/01/2019

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) recently ruled that, unlike medicinal products, medical devices incorpor...

Read more

CJEU Denies SPC for Medical Devices Incorporating an Ancillary Active Ingredient
21/12/2018

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) recently ruled that, unlike medicinal products, medical devices incorpor...

Read more

New Protection for Trade Secrets
26/09/2018

On 14 August, the Act of 30 July 2018 on the protection of trade secrets was published in the Belgian State Gazette, final...

Read more

CJEU in Truvada case: no SPC for A+B (unless "the claims relate necessarily and specifically to t...
27/07/2018

Today (25.07), the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") has rendered a long awaited decision in a dis...

Read more

LexGO Network