More flexibility when filing administrative appeals
22/09/2016

On 3 August 2016, a law was adopted easing the requirements when filing an admissible administrative appeal. According to the Belgian Income Tax Code, an administrative appeal against a federal tax assessment in direct taxes must be filed with the ‘general advisor’ (‘adviseur-generaal’/‘directeur’) of the local tax administration responsible for assessing income taxes, within six months after the assessment note was sent to the taxpayer.

Since 2005, the Belgian Income Tax Code already allows the administrative appeal to remain admissible even when the taxpayer erroneously sends it to the general advisor of another jurisdiction. The general advisor incorrectly receiving the administrative appeal has the legal obligation to forward it to the competent general advisor and to inform the taxpayer thereof. The appeal reception date with the first general advisor still stands in that case.

The Law of 3 August 2016 on the filing of an administrative appeal introduces a new simplification. The administrative appeal will now be admissible if it is sent to “an official” within the tax administration competent for either the application of income taxes or the recovery of taxes. The date on which said official receives the appeal is regarded as the date of administrative appeal. The public servant erroneously receiving the administrative appeal has the legal obligation to forward the appeal to the competent general advisor and to inform the taxpayer thereof. Therefore, in general, any administrative appeal sent to the tax administration will now be considered admissible.

The Law of 3 August 2016 did not contain any provision specifying the new article’s entry into force date, meaning that it is effective as of 21 August 2016, i.e. ten days after publication in the Official Journal.

Earlier this year, an administrative Circular confirmed case law from the Belgian Supreme Court (5 June 2014) allowing an administrative appeal to be admissible even when it is not signed by the taxpayer, as long as there is no doubt that the taxpayer filed the appeal. Furthermore, the same administrative Circular allows an administrative appeal to be validly filed through fax or e-mail (Circular AAFisc Nr. 5/2016 (nr. Ci.
704.063) of 3 February 2016).

Many would welcome the legislative and administrative trend of attaching less importance to formal requirements that may constitute a burden between taxpayers and their rights to dispute (incorrect) tax assessments.
   

Zie ook : Deloitte Legal


Click here to see the ad(s)
Alle artikels Vennootschapsbelasting

Laatste artikels Vennootschapsbelasting

EU Court of Justice orders another judicial State aid review of Belgian Excess Profit Rulings
16/09/2021

On 16 September 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union issued its judgement on whether the Belgian excess profit...

Read more

The reconstitution reserve allows to exempt profits from corporate tax
30/08/2021

The so-called reconstitution reserve is part of the additional economic, tax and financial measures to soften the economic...

The reconstitution reserve allows to exempt profits from corporate tax Read more

Kan een AGB de fiscale voordelen van een ā€œkleine vennootschapā€ genieten?
03/08/2021

Kleine vennootschappen genieten in de vennootschapsbelasting enkele fiscale voordelen. Hoewel talrijke autonome gemeentebe...

Kan een AGB de fiscale voordelen van een ā€œkleine vennootschapā€ genieten? Read more

Het lot van liquidatiereserves bij geruisloze fusies en partiƫle splitsingen: verlies liquidatie...
23/07/2021

Heel wat vennootschappen maken op vandaag gebruik van het regime van de liquidatiereserves. Mits betaling van een liquidat...

Het lot van liquidatiereserves bij geruisloze fusies en partiƫle splitsingen: verlies liquidatieheffing! Read more

LexGO Network