The European Commission fines Google EUR4.34 billion for abuse of dominance

The European Commission has found that Google has been imposing illegal restrictions on Android device manufacturers and mobile network operators to consolidate its dominant position in general internet search since 2011.

In particular, the Commission has concluded that Google abused its Android market dominance in three key areas:

Google has been bundling its search engine and Chrome apps into the operating systems used in Android phones and has set Google as the default search engine. It has also ensured that Google’s search app and its mobile browser are pre-installed on practically all Android devices sold in the European Economic Area (“EEA”).

The Commission has highlighted that pre-installation usually creates a status quo bias as users tend to use the pre-installed search and browser apps that they nd in their devices. According to the Commission, this conduct has reduced the incentives of manufacturers to pre-install competing search and browser apps while deterring users from downloading such apps.

Google has given nancial incentives to large phone manufacturers and mobile network operators to exclusively bundle the Google search app to their devices.

When assessing these incentives, the Commission has referred to the Intel judgment (C-413/14 P) to indicate that it has taken into account, amongst others, the conditions under which the incentives were granted, their duration, their amount and the share of the market covered by them.

Google has prevented phone manufacturers from creating or selling smart mobile devices running on alternative versions of Android that were not previously approved by Google. In particular, the Commission has found evidence that Google’s conduct has precluded several manufacturers from developing and selling devices based on Amazon’s “Fire OS”.

Google has 90 days to put an end over its illegal conduct in an e ective manner. The decision also requires Google to refrain from any measure that has the same or an equivalent object or e ect as these practices.

According to the Commission, the ne of EUR 4,342,865,000 takes into account the duration and gravity of the infringement and has been calculated following the Commission’s 2006 Guidelines. This ne establishes a new record and it nearly doubles the previous record ne, i e , EUR 2.4 billion imposed on Google last year. It is interesting to note that this gure only represents two weeks of revenue for Google’s parent Alphabet Inc.

Related : Gomez-Acebo & Pombo ( Mr. Miguel Troncoso-Ferrer )


Mr. Miguel Troncoso-Ferrer Mr. Miguel Troncoso-Ferrer

Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles European Law

Lastest articles European Law

CJEU: VAT on share disposal costs recoverable in certain cases

VAT on costs incurred in connection with an envisaged share disposal is in principle not recoverable. However, if the reas...

Read more

CJEU gives guidance on self-cleaning in relation to competition law infringements

In a recent judgement of 24 October 2018 (n° C-124/17, Vossloh Laeis GmbH v. Stadtwerke München GmbH), the Europe...

Read more

European Commission charges Slovak rail company with dawn raid obstruction

On 25 September 2018, the European Commission sent a Statement of Objections to ZSSK, a Slovak rail company, alleging that...

European Commission charges Slovak rail company with dawn raid obstruction Read more

No illegal State aid in favour of Mc Donald's in Luxembourg

On 19 September 2018, the European Commission concluded its investigation into two tax rulings granted by Luxembourg to Mc...

No illegal State aid in favour of Mc Donald's in Luxembourg Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Miguel Troncoso-Ferrer

New EU Regulation to ban unjustified geo-blocking in the internal mark

Regulation 2018/302 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 February 2018 on addressing unjusti ed geo-blockin...

Read more

A new Belgian Code of Companies and Associations

An important modification in the field of Belgian corporate law is now on track and it also concerns non-profit associatio...

Read more

The Court of Justice of the EU receives the first preliminary ruling on the EU Damages Directive

A Portuguese court (Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa) has referred the first preliminary ruling request on Directive...

Read more

The General Court of the EU upholds the Commission’s decision whereby Belgium was ordered to reco...

The General Court of the EU has dismissed the appeal filed by Brussels South Charleroi Airport (“BSCA”) agains...

Read more

LexGO Network