Challenging Judgments by Default: New Law Brings Limitation
03/11/2017

On 24 July 2017, the Belgian Official Journal published a law that once more provides for various changes to Belgium's judicial system (Wet van 6 juli 2017 houdende vereenvoudiging, harmonisering, informatisering en modernisering van bepalingen van burgerlijk recht en van burgerlijk procesrecht alsook van het notariaat, en houdende diverse bepalingen inzake justitie/Loi du 6 juillet 2017 portant simplification, harmonisation, informatisation et modernisation de dispositions de droit civil et de procédure civile ainsi que du notariat, et portant diverses mesures en matière de justice) (the "Law Pot-Pourri V").

Although the Law Pot-Pourri V mainly deals with issues unrelated to corporate litigation (such as family law and adoption), it also provides for an important limitation to the possibilities of challenging a judgment by default.

Prior to the Law Pot-Pourri V and pursuant to Article 1047 of the Judicial Code (Gerechtelijk Wetboek/Code Judiciaire), a defendant who had failed to show up in court had the option either to lodge an appeal against the judgment given by default or object to this judgment ("Verzet"/"Opposition" procedure). This last option was particularly beneficial to defendants since it resulted in the case being reheard by the same judge who had initially heard the case. In addition, the defendant remained entitled to appeal the second judgment issued by the first instance judge if this judgment again found against him.

Since the entry into force of the Law Pot-Pourri V, an objection against a judgment by default is no longer possible if the judgment is appealable. Consequently, a defendant who failed to appear before the first instance judge will only be in a position to lodge an appeal and will no longer have the possibility of objecting to the judgment by default issued by the first instance judge.

For judgments which are not subject to appeal, objection proceedings remain available.

The new rule entered into force on 3 August 2017.

Related : Van Bael & Bellis ( Mrs. Catherine Longeval ,  Mr. Quentin Declève )

Mrs. Catherine Longeval Mrs. Catherine Longeval
Partner
clongeval@vbb.com
Mr. Quentin Declève Mr. Quentin Declève
Associate
qdecleve@vbb.com

Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles Civil procedure

Lastest articles Civil procedure

Zorgt het Coronavirus ook voor een opflakkering van class actions in België?
08/06/2020

Intussen wordt algemeen aanvaard dat de Corona pandemie een globale overmachtsituatie uitmaakt waarbij in principe niemand...

Read more

New extension of certain procedural time limits and the written procedure before courts and tribu...
30/04/2020

New extension of certain procedural time limits and the written procedure before courts and tribunals Read more

Covid-19 crisis: hoe zit het met uw lopende juridische procedure?
17/04/2020

In het kader van de huidige gezondheidscrisis heeft de regering het Koninklijk Besluit nr. 2 aangenomen om de verjaringste...

Covid-19 crisis: hoe zit het met uw lopende juridische procedure? Read more

Toegang tot justitie in tijden van Corona
16/04/2020

Nu de semi-lockdown al een maand in voege is, begint meer en meer duidelijk te worden dat de door de overheid opgelegde re...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mrs. Catherine Longeval

European Commission Guidelines on Good Manufacturing Practice specific to Advanced Therapy Medici...
23/11/2017

On 22 November 2017, the European Commission (the “Commission”) adopted new Guidelines on Good Manufactur...

Read more

Challenging Judgments by Default: New Law Brings Limitation
25/10/2017

On 24 July 2017, the Belgian Official Journal published a law that once more provides for various changes to Belgium's...

Read more

Third Party Opposition Against Arbitral Awards Is Admissible, According to Constitutional Court
06/04/2017

On 16 February 2017, the Constitutional Court (Grondwettelijk Hof/Cour Constitutionnelle) (the “Court”) held t...

Read more

Establishment of Market Court: Recent Developments
29/03/2017

The Market Court was established by the Law of 25 December 2016 which effected various changes to Belgium's judicial s...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Quentin Declève

Challenging Judgments by Default: New Law Brings Limitation
25/10/2017

On 24 July 2017, the Belgian Official Journal published a law that once more provides for various changes to Belgium's...

Read more

Belgian Court Rules on Recognition of U.S. Class Action Settlements
07/06/2017

On 23 March 2017, the Ghent Court of Appeal (Hof van Beroep/Cour d’Appel) ("Court of Appeal") handed down ...

Read more

Third Party Opposition Against Arbitral Awards Is Admissible, According to Constitutional Court
06/04/2017

On 16 February 2017, the Constitutional Court (Grondwettelijk Hof/Cour Constitutionnelle) (the “Court”) held t...

Read more

Establishment of Market Court: Recent Developments
29/03/2017

The Market Court was established by the Law of 25 December 2016 which effected various changes to Belgium's judicial s...

Read more

LexGO Network