The taste of cheese cannot be protected by copyright! What about fragrances of perfume?
22/11/2018

The Court of justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) ruled on 13 November 2018 in the case C-310/17 that the taste of cheese is not a “work” in the meaning of the Directive 2001/29/EC on copyrights (“Directive”) and can therefore not be protected by copyright.

Although the CJEU did not rule on the smell of the cheese concerned, this decision will undoubtedly have an impact on the question of protection of fragrances by copyright and may lead to a more harmonised case law throughout Europe. Read more...

1. Background 

The “Heksenkaas” created in 2007 by Levola Hengelo BV (“Levola”), a company under Dutch law, is a spreadable dip with cream cheese.

Smilde Foods BV (“Smilde”), another company under Dutch law, has been manufacturing a product called “Witte Wievenkaas” since January 2014 for the Aldi supermarkets in the Netherlands.

Levola considered that the production and sale of ‘Witte Wievenkaas’ infringed its copyright in the taste of Heksenkaas. Hence, Lovela decided to bring legal action against Smilde due to this infringement.

Levola’s complaint was initially dismissed by the Dutch Gelderland District Court, on the grounds that the taste of Heksenkaas lacked originality and personal character.

Levola appealed this decision and the Dutch Appeals Court referred several questions to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of the concept of a “work” under the Directive and whether it includes the taste of a food product.

2. Answer of the Court

In its judgment of 13 November 2018, the CJEU indicated that, in order to be protected by copyright under the Directive, the taste of a food product must be capable of being classified as a “work”.

-  What does “work” mean under the Directive?

A “work” must meet the following requirements:

it must be original, in the sense that it is the author’s own intellectual creation;
it must be expressed in a manner which makes it identifiable with sufficient precision and objectivity.

Copyright protection may be granted to expressions, but not to ideas, procedures, and methods of operation or mathematical concepts as such, as they need to be expressed in some sort of medium.

-  Can a cheese taste be considered as a “work”?

The taste of a cheese does not meet the form-of-expression requirement since it lacks precision and objectivity because it depends on the consumer’s sense of taste, which is subjective and variable. Indeed, it will depend on factors particular to the consumer, such as age, food preferences and consumption habits.

In addition, the current state of the art does not enable the taste of a product such as cheese to be identified precisely and to be distinguished from the taste of other products.

3. Impact of the decision limited to the food industry?

The taste of a food product can therefore not be considered as a “work” and consequently it cannot be protected by copyright under the Directive.

This decision will undoubtedly have an impact on the question of the protection of fragrances by copyright and may lead to a more harmonised case law in the matter.

In fact, the Supreme Courts in France and in the Netherlands currently have opposed views on the matter.

But the CJEU has not definitely closed the matter as it admits that, if the subject matter protected by copyright must be expressed in a manner which makes it identifiable with sufficient precision and objectivity, that expression is not necessarily in a permanent form. In addition, it recognises that its conclusion depends of the current state of scientific development and, as a consequence, one cannot exclude that the latter will achieve by technical means a precise and objective identification of the taste or smell of the product in question which enables it to be distinguished from the taste or smell of other products of the same kind.

Thus, to be followed....

Related : Lydian ( Mrs. Annick Mottet Haugaard ,  Ms. Olivia Santantonio ,  Ms. Blandine de Lange )

[+ http://www.lydian.be]

Mrs. Annick Mottet Haugaard Mrs. Annick Mottet Haugaard
Partner
annick.mottet@lydian.be
Ms. Olivia Santantonio Ms. Olivia Santantonio
Senior Associate
olivia.santantonio@lydian.be
Ms. Blandine de Lange Ms. Blandine de Lange
Associate
blandine.delange@lydian.be

Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles Intellectual property law

Lastest articles Intellectual property law

Na een aanslepend merkenconflict geeft Red Bull je dan toch “Flügels”
10/07/2019

Ja, “Red Bull geeft je dan toch Flügels”. De producent van de wereldberoemde energiedrank haalt slag thui...

Na een aanslepend merkenconflict geeft Red Bull je dan toch “Flügels” Read more

EU copyright: a further step in the digital era
17/06/2019

On 6 June 2019, the new EU Copyright Directive entered into force. The Copyright Directive is part of a broader initiative...

Read more

Directive droit d'auteur: Des conséquences directes pour les entreprises
12/06/2019

Si vous nous suivez, vous savez que le Journal Officiel de l'Union européenne du 17 mai a publié la...

Directive droit d'auteur: Des conséquences directes pour les entreprises Read more

Vormmerk Capri-Sun doorprikt: hoe bescherm ik de vorm van mijn merk?
06/06/2019

De rode zool van Louboutin, de fles van Malibu en de chocoladerepen van Kit-Kat of Toblerone: weinig dingen zijn zo herken...

Vormmerk Capri-Sun doorprikt: hoe bescherm ik de vorm van mijn merk? Read more

Lastest articles by Mrs. Annick Mottet Haugaard

Implementation of EU Directive No 2015/2436 relating to trademarks into Benelux legislation: wha...
13/12/2018

The EU Directive No 2015/2436 (Directive), one of the pillars of the trademark law reform at the European level, must be t...

Read more

Use of #AD, #SPON or #PROM in social media? Here is the new Belgian landscape for influencers
16/10/2018

On 8 October 2018, the Belgian Advertising Council published Guidelines for online influencers (“Influencer Guidelin...

Read more

Bill on protection of trade secrets: Belgium catches up!
27/06/2018

The EU Directive 2016/943 of 8 June 2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets...

Read more

The European Court of Justice further clarifies the notion of ‘communication to the public’ regar...
19/05/2017

In its ruling of 26 April 2017 (C-527/15), the European Court of Justice (hereafter, the ECJ) has further clarif...

Read more

Lastest articles by Ms. Olivia Santantonio

Published: Belgian Act of 7 April 2019 transposing the NIS Directive
14/05/2019

As announced in our previous ezine, on 12 November 2018, the Belgian government submitted a Draft Act establishing a ...

Read more

Implementation of EU Directive No 2015/2436 relating to trademarks into Benelux legislation: wha...
13/12/2018

The EU Directive No 2015/2436 (Directive), one of the pillars of the trademark law reform at the European level, must be t...

Read more

Bill on protection of trade secrets: Belgium catches up!
27/06/2018

The EU Directive 2016/943 of 8 June 2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets...

Read more

European Cybersecurity Month: Look back on the EU legislative developments of 2016
04/10/2016

As you know, the EU recently adopted the General Data Protection Regulation (hereafter "GDPR") in whic...

Read more

Lastest articles by Ms. Blandine de Lange

Implementation of EU Directive No 2015/2436 relating to trademarks into Benelux legislation: wha...
13/12/2018

The EU Directive No 2015/2436 (Directive), one of the pillars of the trademark law reform at the European level, must be t...

Read more

The European Court of Justice further clarifies the notion of ‘communication to the public’ regar...
19/05/2017

In its ruling of 26 April 2017 (C-527/15), the European Court of Justice (hereafter, the ECJ) has further clarif...

Read more

GDPR: WP29 Issues Guidance on Data Portability
30/12/2016

Article 20 of the GDPR creates a new right to data portability. This allows for data subjects to receive the personal data...

Read more

Repackaging: when is it allowed?
12/12/2016

On 10 November 2016, the European Union Court of Justice (ECJ) rendered a judgment regarding the "need of repackaging...

Read more

LexGO Network