The European Court of Justice further clarifies the notion of ‘communication to the public’ regarding copyright in a digital environment
19/05/2017

In its ruling of 26 April 2017 (C-527/15), the European Court of Justice (hereafter, the ECJ) has further clarified the concept of "communication to the public" in the digital environment. This notion is a core concept of copyright. Indeed, according to article 3 of the Directive 2001/29 harmonizing certain aspects of copyright in the information society (hereafter, the Directive 2001/29), authors have, except as permitted by law, the exclusive right to authorize or prohibit any ‘communication to the public’ of their works.

ECJ previous case law

In its ruling of 8 September 2016 (C-160/15), the ECJ held that the posting of a hyperlink on a website to works protected by copyright and published without the author’s consent on another website constitutes a ‘communication to the public’ when the hyperlinks are provided for profit. In that specific case, as the person who posted the links did not seek financial gain and acted without knowledge that those works were published illegally, the ECJ had estimated that the posting of the hyperlinks did not constitute a ‘communication to the public’ and thus an infringement of copyright.

This judgment was in line with the previous ECJ case law. The case of 26 April goes one step further, as it extends this case law to the sale of a media player and as it further clarifies the concept of ‘communication to the public’ and its application to the digital environment.

Background of the new decision and preliminary question

The case of 26 April opposed Stichting Brein, a foundation that protects the interests of copyright holders, and Mr Jack Frederik Wullems, concerning the sale by him of multimedia players. On those players, Mr Wullems installed an open source software, which made it possible to play files through a user-friendly interface via structured menus, and integrated into it add-ons available on the internet, created by third parties, some of which specifically link to websites on which protected works are made available without the consent of the copyright holders.

Mr Wullems advertised the multimedia player by stating that it made it possible, in particular, to watch on a television screen, freely and easily, audiovisual material available on the internet without the consent of the copyright holders.

Stichting Brein asked the Rechtbank Midden-Nederland (District Court of Midden-Nederland, Netherlands) to order Mr Wullems to cease selling multimedia players including hyperlinks that illegally give users access to protected works. Stichting Brein submitted that, by marketing that multimedia player, Mr Wullems had made a ‘communication to the public’ in breach of the Netherlands law on copyright transposing EU Directive 2001/29.

The Rechtbank Midden Nederland decided to refer a question to the Court of Justice on that subject.

Decision of the Court

In its judgment of 26 April, the Court of Justice held that the sale of a multimedia player, such as the one in question which enables films that are available illegally on the internet to be viewed easily and for free on a television screen, is a ‘communication to the public’, within the meaning of the Directive 2001/29.

The Court recalled, in that regard, its case law according to which the aim of the Directive is to establish a high level of protection for authors and that the concept of ‘communication to the public’ must therefore be interpreted broadly (see notably Case C-466/12 and Case C-348/13).

Moreover, contrary to the case C-160/15, the Court observed that the multimedia player was purchased by a fairly large number of people. Furthermore, the communication at issue covered all persons who could potentially acquire that media player and have an internet connection. Thus, that communication was aimed at an indeterminate number of potential recipients and involved a large number of persons. The Court also noted that the provision of the multimedia player was made in order to make a profit, and that the price for the multimedia player was paid to obtain direct access to protected works available on streaming websites without the consent of the copyright holders. This certainly had an impact on the outcome of its decision.

Related : Lydian ( Mrs. Annick Mottet Haugaard ,  Ms. Blandine de Lange )

[+ http://www.lydian.be]

Mrs. Annick Mottet Haugaard Mrs. Annick Mottet Haugaard
Partner
annick.mottet@lydian.be
Ms. Blandine de Lange Ms. Blandine de Lange
Associate
blandine.delange@lydian.be

Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles Intellectual property law

Lastest articles Intellectual property law

New Tax Deduction for Income from Innovation
24/03/2017

On 2 February 2017, the House of Representatives adopted a bill providing for a new tax deduction for income from innovati...

Read more

Lawful computer program acquirers may not resell back-up copies of those programs
13/03/2017

On 12 October 2016, the CJEU rendered its judgment in the Ranks and Vasiļevičs case. This is an i...

Lawful computer program acquirers may not resell back-up copies of those programs Read more

Parallel Importation of Pharmaceuticals: Supreme Court Acknowledges Objective Justification
15/02/2017

The Supreme Court (Hof van Cassatie/Cour de Cassation) recently handed down two judgments on the repackaging of parallel i...

Read more

Nieuwe innovatieaftrek op komst
10/01/2017

Op 1 juli 2016 werden de fiscale vrijstellingen voor inkomsten uit octrooien afgeschaft. Begin december 2016 werd een voor...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mrs. Annick Mottet Haugaard

Get Your Privacy Shield Certification as from 1st August 2016
21/07/2016

As from 1st August 2016 companies will be able to sign up to a new transatlantic data-transfer framework that will enable ...

Read more

The transfer of personal data to the United States under the "Safe Harbour" principles is no long...
12/10/2015

The judgement rendered by the European Court of Justice on 6 October means that all the past advices given on the transfer...

Read more

Versoepeling van het formalisme op het gebied van precontractuele informatie in het kader van een...
22/05/2014

Het Wetboek van economisch recht viseert voortaan “samenwerkingsovereenkomsten gesloten tussen meerdere personen, wa...

Read more

Assouplissement du formalisme en matière d’information précontractuelle dans le cadre d’un accord...
22/05/2014

Le Code de droit économique vise dorénavant « tout accord de partenariat commercial conclus entre plus...

Read more

Lastest articles by Ms. Blandine de Lange

GDPR: WP29 Issues Guidance on Data Portability
30/12/2016

Article 20 of the GDPR creates a new right to data portability. This allows for data subjects to receive the personal data...

Read more

Repackaging: when is it allowed?
12/12/2016

On 10 November 2016, the European Union Court of Justice (ECJ) rendered a judgment regarding the "need of repackaging...

Read more

LexGO Network