The European Court of Justice further clarifies the notion of ‘communication to the public’ regarding copyright in a digital environment

In its ruling of 26 April 2017 (C-527/15), the European Court of Justice (hereafter, the ECJ) has further clarified the concept of "communication to the public" in the digital environment. This notion is a core concept of copyright. Indeed, according to article 3 of the Directive 2001/29 harmonizing certain aspects of copyright in the information society (hereafter, the Directive 2001/29), authors have, except as permitted by law, the exclusive right to authorize or prohibit any ‘communication to the public’ of their works.

ECJ previous case law

In its ruling of 8 September 2016 (C-160/15), the ECJ held that the posting of a hyperlink on a website to works protected by copyright and published without the author’s consent on another website constitutes a ‘communication to the public’ when the hyperlinks are provided for profit. In that specific case, as the person who posted the links did not seek financial gain and acted without knowledge that those works were published illegally, the ECJ had estimated that the posting of the hyperlinks did not constitute a ‘communication to the public’ and thus an infringement of copyright.

This judgment was in line with the previous ECJ case law. The case of 26 April goes one step further, as it extends this case law to the sale of a media player and as it further clarifies the concept of ‘communication to the public’ and its application to the digital environment.

Background of the new decision and preliminary question

The case of 26 April opposed Stichting Brein, a foundation that protects the interests of copyright holders, and Mr Jack Frederik Wullems, concerning the sale by him of multimedia players. On those players, Mr Wullems installed an open source software, which made it possible to play files through a user-friendly interface via structured menus, and integrated into it add-ons available on the internet, created by third parties, some of which specifically link to websites on which protected works are made available without the consent of the copyright holders.

Mr Wullems advertised the multimedia player by stating that it made it possible, in particular, to watch on a television screen, freely and easily, audiovisual material available on the internet without the consent of the copyright holders.

Stichting Brein asked the Rechtbank Midden-Nederland (District Court of Midden-Nederland, Netherlands) to order Mr Wullems to cease selling multimedia players including hyperlinks that illegally give users access to protected works. Stichting Brein submitted that, by marketing that multimedia player, Mr Wullems had made a ‘communication to the public’ in breach of the Netherlands law on copyright transposing EU Directive 2001/29.

The Rechtbank Midden Nederland decided to refer a question to the Court of Justice on that subject.

Decision of the Court

In its judgment of 26 April, the Court of Justice held that the sale of a multimedia player, such as the one in question which enables films that are available illegally on the internet to be viewed easily and for free on a television screen, is a ‘communication to the public’, within the meaning of the Directive 2001/29.

The Court recalled, in that regard, its case law according to which the aim of the Directive is to establish a high level of protection for authors and that the concept of ‘communication to the public’ must therefore be interpreted broadly (see notably Case C-466/12 and Case C-348/13).

Moreover, contrary to the case C-160/15, the Court observed that the multimedia player was purchased by a fairly large number of people. Furthermore, the communication at issue covered all persons who could potentially acquire that media player and have an internet connection. Thus, that communication was aimed at an indeterminate number of potential recipients and involved a large number of persons. The Court also noted that the provision of the multimedia player was made in order to make a profit, and that the price for the multimedia player was paid to obtain direct access to protected works available on streaming websites without the consent of the copyright holders. This certainly had an impact on the outcome of its decision.

Related : Lydian ( Mrs. Annick Mottet Haugaard ,  Ms. Blandine de Lange )


Mrs. Annick Mottet Haugaard Mrs. Annick Mottet Haugaard
Ms. Blandine de Lange Ms. Blandine de Lange

Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles Intellectual property law

Lastest articles Intellectual property law

Important changes to Benelux Trade Mark Law as per June 1, 2018

The Benelux trade mark System will undergo two important changes as per June 1, 2018. Appeals from decisions of the Ben...

Read more

Géoblocage : aperçu des nouveautés du Règlement européen

Le 28 février 2018, le Parlement européen a adopté un nouveau Règlement visant à c...

Géoblocage : aperçu des nouveautés du Règlement européen Read more

Belgian Council of Ministers approves EU Trade Secrets Directive draft bill

On 8 June 2016, the European Parliament and the Council adopted the Trade Secrets Directive The aim of this Dire...

Belgian Council of Ministers approves EU Trade Secrets Directive draft bill Read more

Crocs killed its own design through public disclosure

The General Court of the EU confirmed the cancellation of the registration for the famous design of Crocs clogs on the gro...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mrs. Annick Mottet Haugaard

Get Your Privacy Shield Certification as from 1st August 2016

As from 1st August 2016 companies will be able to sign up to a new transatlantic data-transfer framework that will enable ...

Read more

The transfer of personal data to the United States under the "Safe Harbour" principles is no long...

The judgement rendered by the European Court of Justice on 6 October means that all the past advices given on the transfer...

Read more

Versoepeling van het formalisme op het gebied van precontractuele informatie in het kader van een...

Het Wetboek van economisch recht viseert voortaan “samenwerkingsovereenkomsten gesloten tussen meerdere personen, wa...

Read more

Assouplissement du formalisme en matière d’information précontractuelle dans le cadre d’un accord...

Le Code de droit économique vise dorénavant « tout accord de partenariat commercial conclus entre plus...

Read more

Lastest articles by Ms. Blandine de Lange

GDPR: WP29 Issues Guidance on Data Portability

Article 20 of the GDPR creates a new right to data portability. This allows for data subjects to receive the personal data...

Read more

Repackaging: when is it allowed?

On 10 November 2016, the European Union Court of Justice (ECJ) rendered a judgment regarding the "need of repackaging...

Read more

LexGO Network