Professional seller vs. specialised seller: what’s in a name?
22/04/2021

On 15 January 2021, the Belgian Supreme Court (Hof van Cassatie / Cour de Cassation) overruled a decision of the Antwerp Court of Appeal of 3 February 2020. The Court of Appeal ruled that sellers may not claim the contractual exoneration for hidden defects given that they should be considered as professional sellers. The Court considered that as professional sellers, they were supposed to know the hidden defects of the goods they sold. Hence, they could not claim any exoneration’s clause for hidden defects. However, the Court of Cassation stated that the Court of Appeal’s decision was not motivated properly since it did not assess whether or not the seller was a specialised seller.

Under Belgian civil law, the seller is liable for the hidden defects of the goods he sells. Nevertheless, the seller may escape from this presumption by inserting an exoneration clause in the sales’ contract. In that case, the buyer will only be able to set aside the exoneration clause if he demonstrates that the seller was aware of the existence of those defects. 

The situation becomes more difficult if the seller is considered as the manufacturer or a specialised seller. In that case, he has an obligation of result: he must deliver goods without defects and take all measures to identify possible defects of the goods. The seller will be able to escape from its liability with an exoneration clause only if he demonstrates that the defect was impossible to detect. In that case, the buyer will not have to demonstrate that the seller was aware of the hidden defects. 

It is up to the court to assess in concreto whether or not the seller can be qualified as a specialised seller in light of two criteria: the degree of specialisation and the technical competence of the seller in question. 

In the case at hand, the Supreme Court points out that this distinction operates independently of whether the seller is classified as a professional or not. It means that it is the criterion of the seller's specialisation and not the question whether the seller is a professional that will determine the conditions to be exonerated from liability for hidden defects.

Consequently: 

a professional seller who is not considered as specialised does not bear the burden of proving that the defect was impossible to detect and could escape from its liability with an exoneration clause if the buyer does not demonstrate that he was aware of the defect.
a seller who is not considered as professional could be nevertheless qualified as specialised and will be able to limit its liability with an exoneration clause only if he demonstrates that the defect was impossible to detect. 

Companies should be aware of this distinction, given the serious legal consequences in practice. The contractual terms of a contract of sales between businesses or between consumers as well as the use of words on communication’s instruments towards buyers should be correctly chosen and formulated.  

Related : Lydian ( Mr. Hugo Keulers ,  Mrs. Karen Janssens )

[+ http://www.lydian.be]

Mr. Hugo Keulers Mr. Hugo Keulers
Partner
[email protected]
Mrs. Karen Janssens Mrs. Karen Janssens
Senior Associate
[email protected]

All articles Commercial practices

Lastest articles Commercial practices

Impact of the new rules on unfair terms in B2B agreements on general terms and conditions
10/03/2021

The Law of 4 April 2019 introduced new mandatory rules that intend to procure that the key terms of contracts between unde...

Read more

What is drop-shipping and how does it differ from a market place?
05/03/2021

In recent years, the practice of drop-shipping has intensified by taking advantage of the boom in e-commerce. While this w...

Read more

New B2B law: insurance sector in the clear?
01/03/2021

The Law of 4 April 2019 (the “B2B Law”)(1) introduced new mandatory rules that intend to procure that the...

Read more

Unfair B2B terms in franchising contracts
03/02/2021

As the B2B law is specifically adopted with a focus on the situation of franchisees who could sometimes be faced with unfa...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Hugo Keulers

Wat u moet weten over het ICC-arbitragereglement 2021
22/01/2021

Arbitrage is een belangrijke alternatieve geschillenbeslechtingsmethode die steeds meer aandacht krijgt van de bedrijfswer...

Read more

Zorgt het Coronavirus ook voor een opflakkering van class actions in België?
08/06/2020

Intussen wordt algemeen aanvaard dat de Corona pandemie een globale overmachtsituatie uitmaakt waarbij in principe niemand...

Read more

Toegang tot justitie in tijden van Corona
16/04/2020

Nu de semi-lockdown al een maand in voege is, begint meer en meer duidelijk te worden dat de door de overheid opgelegde re...

Read more

Hoe (nieuwe) contractuele relaties aangaan en onderhouden ten tijde van het coronavirus?
06/04/2020

In onze vorige e-zine lag de focus voornamelijk op de impact van het coronavirus op bestaande contractuele relat...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mrs. Karen Janssens

Recente cassatierechtspraak inzake de Verzekeringswet 2014: een overzicht
23/12/2020

Met de jaarwisseling in het vooruitzicht, blikt het Insurance team Lydian graag terug op enkele interessante arresten die ...

Read more

Cassatie 7 september 2020: Het verband tussen de bedrieglijke verzwijging door de verzekeringsnem...
26/10/2020

Het Hof van Cassatie brengt deze beginselen van de nietigheid van de combinatiepolis in herinnering in bovenvermeld arrest...

Read more

LexGO Network