Collective actions in Belgium
01/04/2014

The Belgian parliament has approved a new bill introducing a brand new action for collective redress under Belgian law. The bill forms part of the new Belgian Code of Economic Law, and will enter into force on date still to be determined by Royal Decree. The entry into force is, however, expected to take place before the summer.

Background

  • Following various recent cases (Lernout & Hauspie, Citibank, Fortis) which have shown that the existing legal system was not equipped to deal efficiently and within a reasonable time period with cases involving a large number of claimants, Belgium has become aware of the need to allow collective redress for mass damage. During recent years, various draft bills have been prepared by the government or by parliament. None of these initiatives had, however, so far led to the adoption of class action regulation, despite the political consensus. After the government had submitted an agreed draft bill to parliament last summer, the necessary legal framework has now, however, finally been approved by parliament. The bill's main aim is to incite individual consumers to enforce their rights, as they tend not to litigate given the uncertainties, the cost and the duration of legal proceedings. The scope of the law is, at present, limited to actions by consumers, but will serve as a test case which may lead to a broader class action for other types of claimants. It remains to be seen whether the new regime will prove successful, given the important limitations on the financing of and the access to the proceedings, and the centralisation of cases with the already overburdened Brussels courts.

Scope of the collective action

  • Collective actions will only be available in disputes between consumers and undertakings. The action must relate either to an undertaking's breach of contractual obligations, or the infringement of specific consumer protection rules, in the context of, inter alia:

         – privacy and data protection and IP rights;
         – market practices;
        – competition;
         – regulation on banking and finance, pricing, insurance, medicine, professional liability, product safety, transport, travel and energy.

  • A collective action will furthermore only be admissible if a "collective damage" exists, i.e. a physical, moral or material damage arising from a common cause, and giving rise to related factual and legal questions that can be treated in one and the same procedure.
  • For physical or moral damage, an opt-in system applies. In other cases, the court must decide whether an opt-in or opt-out system is more appropriate, taking into account the arguments of the parties. Foreign claimants will always need to opt-in to benefit from the collective action.
  • Collective actions will only be possible in situations where such action is more "appropriate" than an individual action. The court will assess this in light of the balance between the results expected to be achieved and the resources used.

Who can initiate proceedings?

  • The "class" can be represented only by a class representative for the purposes of the proceedings. Only (i) specific organisations with legal personality represented in the

Council for Consumption (e.g. Test-Aankoop/Test-Achat) or accredited by the Minister, (ii) accredited organisations with legal personality, be it consumer organisations or other organisations whose purpose is closely linked to the collective damage, or (iii) the Ombudsman in the negotiation phase of the proceedings, can act in this capacity.

  • Even when a class representative meets the abovementioned criteria, the court must still assess, on a case by case basis, whether the class representative is adequate.

Stages of the procedure

  • The proceedings can be introduced either by a unilateral application filed by the class representative, or by a joint application filed by the representative and the undertaking which is held liable. The purpose of a joint application is to ask the judge to sanction a settlement agreement prenegotiated between the parties.
  • In a first judgment, the judge rules on the admissibility of the claim.
  • After the decision on admissibility, the claim enters a mandatory negotiation stage, taking between 3 and 6 months. During this phase the parties try to reach an agreement on the type of redress, the payment term, the modalities of the calculation, and the quantum of the damages. The damages can be calculated globally, or on an individual basis. Once an agreement is reached, the judge can only refuse to sanction it on limited grounds, in particular when the proposed redress or the term for compensation is "manifestly unreasonable". If no agreement is reached, the court will, in a ruling on the merits of the case, decide on the damages to be awarded. The compensation can only cover the actual damage suffered, and punitive damages are excluded.
  • Once the amount of the damages has been fixed, whether by a court sanctioned settlement agreement or by court decision, the court appoints a lawyer, state official or judicial agent, who will assure the correct execution of the compensation mechanism.

If the harmed consumers do not claim all of the damages awarded, the court may decide how to compensate them, e.g. by obliging the undertaking to grant discounts on products or services.

Other points of interest

  • The law excludes financial compensation for class representatives other than compensation for their costs. Success fees are hence excluded.
  • The law relaxes the rule according to which civil proceedings must be stayed pending criminal proceedings relating to the same facts, and disapplies certain other rules of civil procedure.
  • The Brussels courts will have exclusive competence in relation to collective actions.
  • Collective actions will only be possible for damage caused after the entry into force of the law.

Zie ook : Clifford Chance LLP ( Mr. Sébastien Ryelandt ,  Ms. Dorothée Vermeiren )

Mr. Sébastien Ryelandt Mr. Sébastien Ryelandt
Partner
sebastien.ryelandt@cliffordchance.com
Ms. Dorothée Vermeiren Ms. Dorothée Vermeiren
Associate
dorothee.vermeiren@cliffordchance.com

Click here to see the ad(s)
Alle artikels Burgelijke procedure

Laatste artikels Burgelijke procedure

Pleidooi voor meer realistische dwangsommen, omdat het kan
26/12/2018

De essentie van de dwangsom is om er voor te zorgen dat een veroordeling wordt nageleefd. In de pers verschijnen schrijnen...

Read more

Cross-Border Debt Recovery: Parliament Implements European Account Preservation Order Procedure
19/10/2018

On 7 June 2018, the Chamber of Representatives adopted the Law to promote alternative dispute resolution mechanisms (the &...

Cross-Border Debt Recovery: Parliament Implements European Account Preservation Order Procedure Read more

Advies van de Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit over het DPA-platform en e-deposit voor advocaten
02/10/2018

Advocaten kunnen (vreemd genoeg nog maar) sinds enige tijd elektronisch comuniceren met de rechtbanken voor neerlegging va...

Read more

Cresco blog – The Brussels International Business Court (BIBC): a new forum for international com...
18/01/2018

The recovery of international commercial debts, nor the resolution of international (commercial) disputes has ever been ea...

Cresco blog – The Brussels International Business Court (BIBC): a new forum for international commercial dispute resolution Read more

Laatste artikels van Mr. Sébastien Ryelandt

Laatste artikels van Ms. Dorothée Vermeiren

LexGO Network