Antitrust: A Commitment Decision is a Prima Facie Evidence of an Infringement, for the ECJ
24/11/2017

On 23 November 2017, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) decided that commitment decisions contain indications of an infringement of antitrust rules.

The ECJ rightfully explains that a commitment decision does not validate the company’s conduct under antitrust rules.  It also reminds that they do not prevent national competition authorities or courts from finding that the conduct or agreement concerned violates antitrust rules. 

But, the Court added that national courts are required to take into account the preliminary assessment of the Commission and “to regard it as an indication, if not prima facie evidence, of the anticompetitive nature of the agreement at issue”.   

It is difficult to define the impact of such a judgment. It may, however, give a lot of weight to such a preliminary assessment and its evidentiary value.  As rightfully pointed out by the ECJ,  commitment decisions cannot create a legitimate expectation from the companies that their conduct complies with antitrust rules; but, we would contend that they create the expectation that national courts or agencies are not “required” to regard it as prima facie evidence. 

The decisional nature of commitment decisions should, in our view, be limited to the binding character of the commitments proposed by companies.  Defining  the preliminary assessment as prima facie evidence would conflict with what companies may expect from a commitment process as defined in Regulation 1/2003. 

Judgment of 23 November 2017, Gasorba e.a., C-547/16

Zie ook : Buyle Legal ( Mr. Bruno Lebrun ,  Ms. Laure Bersou )

[+ http://www.buylelegal.be]

Mr. Bruno Lebrun Mr. Bruno Lebrun
Partner
[email protected]
Ms. Laure Bersou Ms. Laure Bersou
Avocat
[email protected]

Click here to see the ad(s)
Alle artikels Europees recht

Laatste artikels Europees recht

New European Commission notice on the enforcement of State aid rules by national courts
24/09/2021

On 23 July 2021, the European Commission adopted a new notice (“Notice”) on the enforcement of EU State aid ru...

New European Commission notice on the enforcement of State aid rules by national courts Read more

EU Court of Justice orders another judicial State aid review of Belgian Excess Profit Rulings
16/09/2021

On 16 September 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union issued its judgement on whether the Belgian excess profit...

Read more

EU Foreign Subsidies and Antitrust: an ongoing quest towards certainty and clarity
13/09/2021

The European Commission’s proposed regulation on foreign subsidies consists of two notification-based tools to inves...

Read more

The CJEU extends Achmea to intra-EU Energy Charter Treaty arbitrations
02/09/2021

In a judgment dated 2 September 2021 in Komstroy v Moldova (Case C-741/19), the Court of Justice of the Eur...

The CJEU extends Achmea to intra-EU Energy Charter Treaty arbitrations Read more

Laatste artikels van Mr. Bruno Lebrun

Laatste artikels van Ms. Laure Bersou

LexGO Network