Thomas Cook-Brussels Airlines case: Belgian Competition Authority confirms restrictive practice but does not impose sanctions

In August 2017, the Belgian Competition Authority (BMA) opened an investigation into potential anticompetitive practices resulting from the conclusion of a "Commercial Service Agreement" between Thomas Cook Belgium and Brussels Airlines.

Under such agreement, Thomas Cook Belgium had to purchase a certain number of seats to certain destinations from Brussels Airlines. Brussels Airlines, for its part, could not sell seats on certain flights to third party tour operators. The clauses in the agreement also included an obligation for Brussels Airlines to provide information to Thomas Cook Belgium on the development of the activities of third party tour operators.

In a February 2020 press release, the Investigation and Prosecution Service of the BMA announced that it had submitted a proposed decision to the Competition College whereby it considered that these clauses foreclose the wholesale market for airline seats and provide for the exchange of sensitive commercial information.

However, the Investigation and Prosecution Service proposed that the Competition College did not impose fines on the companies concerned because the agreement was never implemented and was terminated following the Thomas Cook bankruptcy.

The parties were given the opportunity to make written submissions prior to the hearing before the College, and to present their position at such hearing.

The College, which had to determine whether or not there had been an infringement of competition law and, if so, whether a fine should be imposed, decided on 1 July 2020 that the agreement was contrary to Article 101 TFEU and that it restricted competition. However, no fine was imposed. The College took into account the specific facts of the case, namely that the agreement wasn’t implemented due to the Thomas Cook bankruptcy, and because Brussels Airlines had cooperated with the Investigation and Prosecution Service during the investigation.


Marguerite Soete, Associate, Brussels

Annabelle Lepièce, Partner, Brussels

Zie ook : CMS Belgium


Click here to see the ad(s)
Alle artikels Mededingingsrecht

Laatste artikels Mededingingsrecht

Beperking van persvrijheid – Laster van concurrerend persorgaan kan oneerlijke marktpraktijk ui...

Rechtbank van Koophandel te Luik1 oordeelt dat het opzetten van een lastercampagne een oneerlijke marktpraktijk uitma...

Read more

Submission of a proposal for decision against Caudalie for imposing a minimum resale price on its...

On 20 November 2020, the Investigation and Prosecution Service of the Belgian Competition Authority announced that it had ...

Submission of a proposal for decision against Caudalie for imposing a minimum resale price on its selective distributors Read more

First Belgian ruling on abuse of economic dependence

First Belgian ruling on abuse of economic dependence: much looked forward too, little precedential value?

Read more

Afwerving van cliënteel – Communicatie ter actualisering van klantenbestanden

Het Hof van Beroep te Brussel oordeelde dat communicatie gericht aan klanten van een concurrent ter actualisering van klan...

Read more

LexGO Network