To hyperlink or not? Posting a hyperlink can infringe copyrights
14/09/2016

On 8 September, the Court of Justice (“CJEU”) in the GS Media BV v. Sanoma Media a.o. case (C-160-15), within the framework of a preliminary ruling requested by the Supreme Court of the Netherlands, held that GS Media, by posting hyperlinks that give access to copyright-protected work which is freely accessible on another website without the consent of the right holder, and knowing that the hyperlinks were published without the consent of the right holder, made a communication to the public in the sense of article 3(1) of the Information Society Directive 2001/29/EC. 

The Court decided that if persons hyperlinking know or must have known that the copyright-protected work on the original website was published without the consent of the copyright holder, the hyperlink itself also constitutes a copyright infringement. Remarkably, the Court also goes a step further as it established a rebuttable presumption “against” persons posting hyperlinks while pursuing financial gain. They are presumed to be aware of the illegal nature of the publication on the original website and therefore they infringe copyright law by hyperlinking to it. 

The facts underlying this case were the following: several articles containing hyperlinks to other websites on which nude photographs of “Ms Dekker” were made available (with one article even containing a cut-out of one of these photographs) were published during 2011 on the “geenstijl” website, which is operated by GS Media. The copyrights in these pictures had been transferred from the photographer to Sanoma. Sanoma was thereby granted the exclusive right to publish these photographs. Sanoma had, however, not consented to the publication of these photos on websites. Despite numerous attempts by Sanoma to persuade GS Media’s parent company to remove the hyperlinks, its requests were ignored. Sanoma also put on notice the websites to which the hyperlinks linked, and those websites removed the photos. 

This judgment of the CJEU could have far-reaching consequences, as it places a high burden of proof on companies posting hyperlinks on their sponsored websites (having to rebut the presumption). 

 

Alexis Hallemans, Associate Partner, alexis.hallemans@cms-db.com
Simon-Pierre Pype, Junior Associate, simonpierre.pype@cms-db.com

 

Voir aussi : CMS Belgium

[+ http://www.cms-db.com]


Click here to see the ad(s)
Tous les articles Droit de la propriété industrielle

Derniers articles Droit de la propriété industrielle

Crocs killed its own design through public disclosure
20/03/2018

The General Court of the EU confirmed the cancellation of the registration for the famous design of Crocs clogs on the gro...

Read more

Nieuwe innovatieaftrek op komst
10/01/2017

Op 1 juli 2016 werden de fiscale vrijstellingen voor inkomsten uit octrooien afgeschaft. Begin december 2016 werd een voor...

Nieuwe innovatieaftrek op komst Read more

Repackaging: when is it allowed?
12/12/2016

On 10 November 2016, the European Union Court of Justice (ECJ) rendered a judgment regarding the "need of repackaging...

Read more

The beneficiary of a patent licence must pay the agreed royalty even if it does not infringe the ...
10/08/2016

The German company Behringwerke granted the company Genetech a worldwide non-exclusive licence to use a patented human cyt...

Read more

LexGO Network