LexGo

CJEU Upholds Prohibition on the Sale of Luxury Goods via Branded Third-party Internet Platforms
07/12/2017

The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has just ruled, in the context of a selective distribution system for luxury goods, that contractual clauses prohibiting authorised distributors from selling those goods on branded third-party Internet platforms can be compatible with the EU competition rules.

Such a prohibition must meet three conditions:

- its objective is to preserve the luxury image of the goods;
- it is applied objectively and in a non-discriminatory manner; and 
- the restriction is proportionate and does not go beyond what is necessary.

This judgment will be welcomed by the luxury goods industry, which, in the wake of the European Commission Vertical Guidelines, has been concerned about the negative impact on the image of luxury goods of sales through branded third-party platforms such as eBay or Amazon and an overly rigid application of the EU competition rules in that respect.

Background

Coty Germany sells luxury cosmetics in Germany. In order to preserve the brand's image, the products are made available to consumers solely through a selective distribution network, i.e. authorised distributors. The sales outlets of those authorised distributors must meet certain requirements in terms of  their environment, décor and furnishing. Coty's authorised distributors are allowed to sell online, but only in their own web shops and provided the luxury nature of the products is maintained. They are expressly prohibited from selling online via third-party platforms.

Parfümerie Akzente, one of the Coty’s authorised German distributors, sold Coty products on Amazon in Germany, in violation of the distribution agreement. Coty Germany brought proceedings before a German court against Parfümerie Akzente, with a view to prohibiting it from distributing Coty products on Amazon. The Frankfurt court of appeal referred the case to the CJEU.

Judgment

Referring to Dior v Copad (C 59/08), the CJEU recalled that luxury goods may benefit from a selective distribution system designed primarily to preserve their image. This does not breach EU law, to the extent retailers are selected on the basis of objective qualitative criteria, uniformly applicable to all potential retailers in a non-discriminatory fashion and which do not go beyond what is necessary (paras. 24 and 29).

The Court noted that the quality of luxury goods results not only from their material (or tangible) characteristics but also from their overall allure and prestigious image. An "aura of luxury" is an essential aspect of the goods as it enables consumers to distinguish them from similar goods. Impairment of this aura of luxury is likely to affect the actual quality of the goods (para. 25).

As the clause in question does not prohibit Internet sales in general, only the use of third-party platforms, the Court concluded that the prohibition is an appropriate measure to preserve the prestigious image of luxury cosmetics. The Court added that while the clause restricts a certain type of Internet sale, it does not amount to a general restriction on customers or on passive sales to end users within the meaning of Article 4(b) and (c) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices (para. 68).

Voir aussi : NautaDutilh ( Mr. Tanguy de Haan )

[+ http://www.nautadutilh.com]


Click here to see the ad(s)
Tous les articles Droit Européen

Derniers articles Droit Européen

The Court of Justice of the EU clarifies antitrust exemption for agricultural associations (Judge...
15/12/2017

In 2012, the French Competition Authority fined endive producers €4 million for alleged anticompetitive behaviour imp...

Read more

Belgian tax measures for maritime transport approved by the European Commission
15/12/2017

In March 2015, Belgium notified the European Commission of the extension of a support scheme for maritime transport, which...

Belgian tax measures for maritime transport approved by the European Commission Read more

Tax Rulings vs State Aids : European Commission 1 – Ireland 0
11/12/2017

That title is normally used in sport games rather for than tax or competition issues. Nevertheless, it reflects the fact t...

Read more

The General Court of the EU annuls the Commission’s clearance decision of Liberty Global’s acquis...
07/12/2017

In October 2014, the European Commission approved the proposed acquisition of Dutch cable TV operator Ziggo by Liberty Glo...

Read more

Derniers articles de Mr. Tanguy de Haan

ECJ Rules Against Pro-Sugar Health Claims
20/06/2017

Yesterday (on 13 June 2017), the Court of Justice of the European Union dismissed Dextro Energy’s appeal against the...

Read more

Beware of Tenants Selling Counterfeit Goods!
20/07/2016

In a recent decision, Tommy Hilfiger et al. v Delta Center (C-494/15), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) o...

Read more

EU Court Rejects Glucose Related Health Claims
18/03/2016

Yesterday, the General Court confirmed that the European Commission is entitled to refuse to authorize health claims ...

Read more

LexGO Network