Submission of a proposal for decision against Caudalie for imposing a minimum resale price on its selective distributors
26/11/2020

On 20 November 2020, the Investigation and Prosecution Service of the Belgian Competition Authority announced that it had submitted a motivated proposal for decision to the President of the Belgian Competition Authority regarding alleged anticompetitive practices committed by Caudalie, a company that produces and distributes cosmetics and sells them via a selective distributors network. The practices under investigation concern the imposition of a minimum resale price on its selective distributors by establishing a maximum discount level and the limitation of active and passive sales by its selective distributors that are active online for sales to customers established in another Member State.

The investigation was launched in November 2017, and in February 2018 the Investigation and Prosecution Service carried out inspections (so-called dawn raids) in Belgium and at Caudalie’s headquarters in France.

On completion of the investigation, the Competition Prosecutor concluded that there was enough evidence to present the case before the Competition College and to demonstrate the existence of anticompetitive practices in violation of Article IV.1 of the Code of Economic Law and Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

The Competition College will now assess the case. Caudalie will be able to present written comments on the proposal for decision and will be heard at the hearing before the Competition Council. Third parties may intervene at this stage if they can demonstrate an interest in the case. The Competition College will assess whether or not there has been an infringement of competition law and, if an infringement is established, If the Competition College establishes that there has been an infringement of competition law, it can impose a fine on Caudalie of up to 10% of its global turnover in 2019. The final decision of the Competition College may be challenged before the Market Court. 

 

Annabelle Lepièce,Partner, Brussels

 

Voir aussi : CMS Belgium

[+ http://www.cms-db.com]


Tous les articles Droit de la concurrence

Derniers articles Droit de la concurrence

Actions en dommages et intérêts pour infraction au droit de la concurrence – protégez vos ar...
01/04/2021

Vu l’obligation de télétravail qui est de mise depuis un bon bout de temps, vous oubliez votre badge l...

Actions en dommages et intérêts pour infraction au droit de la concurrence – protégez vos arrières Read more

Priorities of the Belgian Competition Authority for 2021
18/03/2021

On 10 March 2021, the Belgian Competition Authority issued its annual communication setting out its policy priorities for ...

Priorities of the Belgian Competition Authority for 2021 Read more

Google closes its acquisition of Fitbit following European Commission conditional clearance
30/01/2021

Earlier this month Google closed its acquisition of Fitbit, following an in-depth investigation by the European Commission...

Google closes its acquisition of Fitbit following European Commission conditional clearance Read more

Dawn raid’s illegality does not automatically void the subsequent request for information
13/01/2021

Brussels Markets Courts confirms two-step test for determining the effects of a dawn raid’s illegality.

Read more

LexGO Network