The European Commission (“EC”) is collecting data and feedback from stakeholders about the European Union’s (“EU”) current rules on packaging and packaging waste.
With about 800 codes, a Belgian income tax return is not for the faint-hearted. When the Cayman tax is involved, even more attention is needed. Read all about it here and avoid the Cayman tax pitfalls in your income tax planning.
A partir de demain, le 1er juillet 2020, le montant maximum de l'indemnité kilométrique forfaitaire est de 0,3542 EUR par kilomètre. Il s'agit d'une diminution du montant, qui est de 0,3653 EUR jusqu'au 30 juin 2020.
Belgian tax authorities have negotiated agreements with border countries on the tax impact of international travel restrictions and health instructions (work at home) on cross-border workers and their employers
The agreements concluded between Belgium and the Netherlands/Luxembourg, which implement a mutual “force majeure tolerance” for cross-border workers in relation to COVID-19 (travel) restrictions, were already extended until 31 august 2020. We anticipated that a similar extension would become applicable for the agreements between Belgium and Germany/France). This has now been confirmed.
Une proposition de loi déposée le 17 juin dernier (Ecolo/Groen/CD&V/Spa/PS) prévoit l’obligation de soumettre tous les actes de donations notariés à l’enregistrement.
On 24 June 2020, the Council of the European Union (the Council) adopted an amendment to the Mandatory Disclosure Directive ((Directive (EU) 2018/855) the Directive) allowing EU Member States an option to defer by up to six months the time limits for the filing and exchange of the reportable arrangements.
On 24 June 2020, the Council of the European Union (the Council) adopted an amendment to the Mandatory Disclosure Directive ((Directive (EU) 2018/855) the Directive) allowing EU Member States an option to defer by up to six months the time limits for the filing and exchange of the reportable arrangements.
In de aangifte personenbelasting moet een belastingplichtige diens burgerlijke staat aangeven. In deze casus was een belastingplichtige klaarblijkelijk de kluts kwijt en had ze zich precies op dit punt vergist. Kan een dergelijke vergissing rechtgezet worden? Het hof van beroep te Gent moest zich hier recent over uitspreken (Gent 3 december 2019, 2018/AR/1898).
In een arrest van 11 juni 2020 spreekt het Hof van Cassatie zich (nog maar eens) uit over de zogenaamde (fiscale) Antigoon-leer en komt tot het besluit dat het in het kader van een strafprocedure onrechtmatig verkregen bewijsmateriaal alsnog gebruikt kan worden voor de fiscale naheffing.
