The Court of Justice of the EU clarifies the assessment of position marks for services
14/10/2020

The Court of Justice of the EU recently clarified the criteria to take into account when assessing the distinctive character of a position mark applied for in respect of services, in this case passenger transport services (CJEU Östgötatrafiken judgment, Case C-456/19).

Since 2003, the Swedish urban transport company Östgötatrafiken has held several figurative trade marks, which it affixes to its vehicles. In 2016, it applied for three new trade marks, described as “position marks”, consisting of coloured ellipses of different sizes placed in a certain position on buses and trains.

The Swedish Trade Mark Office refused registration on the ground that the shape and colours of the signs did not depart significantly from those used by other transport undertakings on the market to decorate their vehicles, meaning they would not be perceived by the public as an indication of origin. The Stockholm trial court confirmed the refusal of registration.

At the appellate level, however, the Stockholm Court of Appeal sought a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice, as it was reluctant to apply to services the strict criterion used to assess whether the shape of a product is distinctive, namely whether it constitutes a significant departure from the standard or habits of the sector. In this case, the coloured motifs are affixed in a particular way to buses and trains used to provide transport services, but the shape of the vehicles is not per se the subject of the trade mark applications.

The Court of Justice confirmed that the public perceives the coloured motifs as being affixed to the vehicles, which serve as their exclusive medium, and that this perception must be taken into account. However the Court held that “it is not necessary to examine whether the signs for which registration as a trade mark is sought depart significantly from the norm or customs of the economic sector concerned”. The signs at issue are not indissociable from the shape or packaging of the goods, nor do they represent the layout of a physical space in which services are provided (as was found to be the case with the interior of an Apple store; Case C-421/13).

Therefore, it is now up to the Stockholm Court of Appeal to reassess the signs in question, without taking into account the criterion applicable to three-dimensional trade marks wrongly applied to the signs at stake by the Swedish Trade Mark Office and the lower court.

Related : NautaDutilh ( Mr. Tanguy de Haan )

[+ http://www.nautadutilh.com]


Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles European Law

Lastest articles European Law

EU Omnibus Directive: what is the impact of the consumer protection reform for traders? Some take...
23/11/2020

Nearly one year ago, the EU Parliament adopted the directive No 2019/2161 (better known as the “Omnibus Di...

Read more

EIOPA outlines approach on product oversight and governance
18/11/2020

EIOPA published a paper on its approach to product oversight and governance requirements for insurance distributors and ma...

EIOPA outlines approach on product oversight and governance Read more

A European passport for crowdfunding
17/11/2020

At last, a European passport for crowdfunding! As from 10 November 2021, it will be possible for both new and existing cro...

A European passport for crowdfunding Read more

The EU digital finance package: unwrapping digitally fit rules for financial services
16/11/2020

The European Commission is eager to accelerate the EU’s digital transition and to ensure EU leadership in the realm ...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Tanguy de Haan

CJEU renders important decision on the liability of online platforms in trade mark infringement c...
07/04/2020

On 2 April 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) rendered a judgment (C-567/18) clarifying...

Read more

EU Copyright: lending out vehicles with radio receivers is not a “communication to the public”
03/04/2020

On 2 April 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) rendered a judgment (C-753/18) ...

Read more

And if we installed surveillance cameras at work?
26/12/2019

Can an employer that wishes to verify the productivity of its employees, that notes damage to its property and would like ...

Read more

Are Your Trade Marks Adequately Protected?
24/12/2019

Every business uses signs to distinguish its goods or services on the market. These signs may take the form of words, name...

Read more

LexGO Network