Tax Rulings vs State Aids : European Commission 1 – Ireland 0
11/12/2017

That title is normally used in sport games rather for than tax or competition issues. Nevertheless, it reflects the fact that the European Commission (the “Commission”), after its decision to refer Ireland to the Court of Justice of the European Union (the “ECJ”) for failing to recover illegal tax benefits from Apple on 4 October 2017, won the first round against Ireland.

Further to its decision of August 2016, the Commission considered that Ireland’s tax ruling in favour of Apple were illegal under EU State Aid rules and ordered Ireland to recover up to 13 billion EUR. While Apple and Ireland have brought actions to cancel the Commission’s decision, this did not suspend Ireland’s obligation to recover the illegal aid according to EU State aid rules. Therefore, the Commission decided to refer Ireland to the ECJ.

The pressure exercised by the Commission and its Commissioner, Margrethe Vestager, in charge of competition policy, has paid off. Even if the Irish government criticized the measure, Ireland recently announced that an agreement has been obtained with Apple for the payment of the requested amount. According to Ireland, this large amount should be wired during the first quarter of 2018.

In the same vain, the Commission has been investigating several tax ruling practice in various Member states since June 2013 and had set up a dedicated Tax Force to scrutinize favourable tax treatment of certain companies, in particular in the form of tax rulings.

The Commission extended its inquiry to all Member states in December 2014, including a list of tax rulings issued previously for the benefit of companies like Starbucks in the Netherlands, McDonald’s, Fiat and Amazon in Luxembourg. On 4 October 2017, the Commission adopted a similar decision that forces Luxembourg to recover unpaid taxes from Amazon amounting to 250 million EUR, on the basis that tax benefits granted to Amazon were illegal under EU State aid rules.

These decisions have significant financial implications for the parties concerned as they potentially result in an obligation to repay several years of “tax savings” with interest. This means that, in addition to review tax rulings from a pure tax law perspective, companies should assess any ruling validating a specific tax arrangement in Europe in light of EU State aid law and obtain adequate State aid advice.

This has been confirmed on 21 November 2017, when Commissioner Vestager emphasized that state aid cases brought against special tax treatment “are only a part in a much bigger investigation of more than 1,000 rulings as part of that work”. It can reasonably be expected, in the near future, that the Commission open more state aid cases regarding tax rulings granted to companies regardless of their size.

Therefore, any corporate taxpayer that benefitted from a ruling from the tax authority of a Member State of the European Union in the past ten years is potentially a target of the Commission’s investigation and should be prepared for it.

Related : AB Legal ( Mr. Marc Picat )

[+ http://www.ablegal.be]


Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles Corporate tax

Lastest articles Corporate tax

General Court sets framework for the Commission to enforce arm’s length transfer pricing under ...
12/11/2019

On 24 September 2019, the General Court upheld the Commission’s decision that Fiat had received unlawful State aid f...

General Court sets framework for the Commission to enforce arm’s length transfer pricing under State aid rules (Fiat and Starbucks) Read more

Week van de bedrijfsoverdracht | Het fiscaal gunstregime bij de overdracht van uw familiebedrijf ...
31/10/2019

Heel vaak hebben bedrijfsleiders het moeilijk om volledig afscheid te nemen van een onderneming die zij hebben opgestart e...

Week van de bedrijfsoverdracht | Het fiscaal gunstregime bij de overdracht van uw familiebedrijf uitgelegd Read more

Belgian Constitutional Court annuls tax on securities accounts. What to do next?
21/10/2019

In a judgment rendered on 17 October 2019, the Belgian Constitutional Court ruled that the national tax on securities acco...

Belgian Constitutional Court annuls tax on securities accounts. What to do next? Read more

OECD heading beyond the arm’s-length principle without ring-fencing the digital economy
10/10/2019

On 9 October 2019, the OECD published a proposed unified approach to reform profit allocation rules (Pillar One of its wor...

OECD heading beyond the arm’s-length principle without ring-fencing the digital economy Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Marc Picat

A new Belgian law aiming at facilitating damages claims for competition law infringements
03/07/2017

The Belgian law of 6 June 20171entered into force on 22 June 2017 (hereafter, the “Law”) transposes the &...

Read more

Court of Justice opens up international jurisdiction for online sales
16/02/2017

The Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) issued a ruling on 21 December 2016 (Case C-618/15) concer...

Read more

Brexit – Implications in the field of competition law
20/07/2016

On June 23, 2016, UK took the historic resolution to leave the EU which will be implemented by triggering Article 50 of th...

Read more

EU Commission notice of notion of State Aid
25/05/2016

On 19 May 2016, the EU Commission (EC) published its final Notice on the notion of State Aid further to its State Aid Mode...

Read more

LexGO Network