COVID-19 and public procurement in Belgium
01/04/2020

Measures have been taken by the Belgian authorities to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. These measures have serious repercussions on many companies that are used to doing business with authorities and public law entities. Companies may be unable to timely submit a tender in a public procurement procedure or they may no longer be able to perform their obligations under their public contracts. However, the public procurement rules may provide for some relief for those companies.

Can a candidate or tenderer invoke force majeure during the award procedure?

In view of the current Covid-19 crisis, tenderers may be unable to timely submit a request for participation or a tender in a public procurement procedure. For example, a candidate or tenderer may not be able to provide all the requested documents on time. The question is whether a candidate or tenderer can then invoke force majeure in order to safeguard its participation in the public procurement procedure.

Force majeure in the award phase by a candidate or tenderer has so far mainly been accepted by the Belgian State Council (the administrative supreme court) for last-minute issues with the electronic signature of tenders, issues with electronic tender platforms or issues with the continuity of postal services. Similarly, force majeure may be invoked in cases where certain documents from official instances requested in a timely manner were not delivered on time.

In order to prove force majeure, the candidate or tenderer will have to show that every effort has been made to avoid the force majeure. The burden of proving force majeure lies with the candidate or tenderer. The candidate or tenderer will have to prove the force majeure by means of documentary evidence. This evidence must demonstrate that the force majeure was unforeseeable and reasonably unavoidable.

If force majeure is accepted, the contracting authority must mitigate the consequences. Importantly, the contracting authority can only accept force majeure if there is no risk of manipulation of the content of those requests for participation or tenders.

In most cases, however, it will not be necessary to do so. For example, contracting authorities may, on their own initiative, choose to postpone the deadline for submission.  When doing so, they must take into account the principles of equality and reasonableness. The public sector was quick to acknowledge the seriousness of the situation. For example, a circular from the Walloon Government dated 26 March 2020 (the Circular) provides guidance to the contracting authorities that fall under the Walloon Government.  The Circular advises, amongst other things, for the deadline for on-going award procedures to be postponed until after 20 April 2020. The Walloon Government also asks that no new contracts be awarded before 20 April 2020.

Is a contractor under a public procurement contract entitled to extension of the time-limits?

Contractors performing public contracts for works, supplies or services may experience difficulties to perform their obligations as a result of the crisis.  Some activities may no longer be possible due to social distancing rules, essential supplies from abroad may have become difficult or impossible and suppliers or subcontractors may be unavailable.

Under these circumstances, contractors may request an extension of the deadlines or a compensation of costs following from exceptional circumstances on the basis of the Royal Decree of 14 January 2013 establishing the general conditions for the performance of public procurement contracts (the GCP). The GCP apply to most public procurement contracts, unless specifically provided otherwise in the contractual documentation.

The GCP provide for a ‘hardship clause’, i.e. the right for the contractor to request a review of the contract, even if the contract does not provide for a specific arrangement. Such review may include the extension of the contractual deadlines or compensation of additional costs to the extent they exceed certain thresholds.

A tenderer that wishes to claim such extension or compensation must demonstrate that the amendment has become necessary as a result of circumstances that it could not reasonably foresee at the time of the submission of its tender, that it could not avoid and the consequences of which it could not provide for, although it has taken all the necessary measures.

Alternatively, the contractor may invoke a force majeure event, making the performance of its obligations impossible – therefore making the performance of the contract also impossible – due to an insurmountable event beyond its control, even though it had taken all the necessary measures.  Depending on the circumstances, the government measures in relation to the lockdown and their consequences may characterize as force majeure.

It is important that contractors act timely in order to benefit from the above. The GCP require that the contractor must notify the contracting authority in writing and within 30 days of (i) the relevant facts and (ii) their impact on the progress and cost of the performance of the contract. A duly justified request in writing for relief must then follow.

The Walloon Government Circular referred to above refers to the possibility for the successful tenderer to request a review of the contract for unforeseeable circumstances. The Walloon Government asks the contracting authorities to treat any requests with common sense and in good faith. Although we are currently not aware of similar measures at other levels, we expect other contracting authorities to apply the same principles.

Related : Loyens & Loeff CVBA ( Mr. Valentijn De Boe ,  Mr. Felix Feyt ,  Mr. Atdhe Krasniqi )

[+ http://www.loyensloeff.com]

Mr. Valentijn De Boe Mr. Valentijn De Boe
Partner
valentijn.de.boe@loyensloeff.com
Mr. Felix Feyt Mr. Felix Feyt
Associate
felix.feyt@loyensloeff.com
Mr. Atdhe Krasniqi Mr. Atdhe Krasniqi
Junior Associate
atdhe.krasniqi@loyensloeff.com

Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles Private Public Partnership

Lastest articles Private Public Partnership

Flemish Decree on Major Projects and Programmes
06/05/2019

On 27 April 2019, a Flemish decree establishing a framework for major projects and programmes entered into force. The decr...

Read more

New provisions regarding exclusion grounds in public procurement: corrective measure
04/05/2017

The new public procurement legislation, which is expected to enter into force on 30 June 2017, contains new provisions for...

New provisions regarding exclusion grounds in public procurement: corrective measure Read more

Imminent but gradual entry into force of new Belgian legislation on public procurement
12/04/2017

According to the last version of the draft royal decree on the award of public procurements in classic sectors (available ...

Imminent but gradual entry into force of new Belgian legislation on public procurement Read more

CJEU confirms assessment methodology shall in principle not be notified in advance in contract do...
13/12/2016

The Court of Justice (“CJEU”) recently ruled (14 July 2016, C-6/15) on the question of whether contracting aut...

CJEU confirms assessment methodology shall in principle not be notified in advance in contract documents Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Valentijn De Boe

CJEU gives guidance on self-cleaning in relation to competition law infringements
09/11/2018

In a recent judgement of 24 October 2018 (n° C-124/17, Vossloh Laeis GmbH v. Stadtwerke München GmbH), the Europe...

Read more

Tip 3: Deelnemen aan overheidsopdrachten - vermijd de typische valkuilen
29/06/2018

Kernpunten -  Aanbestedende overheden zijn verplicht om substantieel onregelmatige offertes uit te sluiten. - &...

Read more

Flemish Decree introduces temporary work for Flemish public services
11/06/2018

Although many Flemish authorities regularly rely on temporary workers, a decree of 27 April 2018 (published on 16 May 2018...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Felix Feyt

CJEU gives guidance on self-cleaning in relation to competition law infringements
09/11/2018

In a recent judgement of 24 October 2018 (n° C-124/17, Vossloh Laeis GmbH v. Stadtwerke München GmbH), the Europe...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Atdhe Krasniqi

LexGO Network