A managerial and/or confidential position does not always preclude overtime pay
17/04/2017

In its decision of 6 May 2016, the Labour Court of Appeal of Liège examined the case of an employee claiming payment of overtime from his former employer. The latter contested the validity of the employee’s claim, notably because it considered that the employee had not provided evidence of the overtime hours and, furthermore, the employee held a managerial and confidential position.

Having ruled that the employee had provided evidence of the overtime, the Court did however agree that the employee held a managerial and confidential position. In this respect, the Court highlighted the ongoing debate in case law concerning payment of overtime for managerial and/or confidential personnel: some argue that no payment at all is due for overtime, whereas others argue that, even though no extra payment is due, normal remuneration is due.

In this particular case, the Labour Court of Appeal of Liège favoured the second argument. In its view, normal remuneration for overtime hours may be claimed by the employee if there is a legal basis other than the Act of 16 March 1971, in particular the employment contract, custom or even equity.

In its decision of 6 May 2016, the Labour Court of Appeal of Liège examined the case of an employee claiming payment of overtime from his former employer. The latter contested the validity of the employee’s claim, notably because it considered that the employee had not provided evidence of the overtime hours and, furthermore, the employee held a managerial and confidential position.

Having ruled that the employee had provided evidence of the overtime, the Court did however agree that the employee held a managerial and confidential position. In this respect, the Court highlighted the ongoing debate in case law concerning payment of overtime for managerial and/or confidential personnel: some argue that no payment at all is due for overtime, whereas others argue that, even though no extra payment is due, normal remuneration is due.

In this particular case, the Labour Court of Appeal of Liège favoured the second argument. In its view, normal remuneration for overtime hours may be claimed by the employee if there is a legal basis other than the Act of 16 March 1971, in particular the employment contract, custom or even equity.

This decision reminds us that the employer is not immune from all claims to (normal) remuneration for overtime hours worked by managerial and/or confidential personnel when the employment contract or a custom within the organization (or even equity) allows the employee to claim it.

Each employer should therefore review its organization’s situation in order to anticipate and, if possible, prevent such claims.


Marie-Cécile Kinif
mariececile.kinif@cms-db.com

Related : CMS Belgium


Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles Labour law

Lastest articles Labour law

Afzien van de schorsing van de opzeggingstermijn
28/04/2017

Het komt wel meer voor dat werkgever en werknemer overeenkomen dat de oorzaken van schorsing van de arbeidsovereenkom...

Read more

Loonnorm – Impact van de nieuwigheden op uw bedrijf?
28/04/2017

Ter herinnering, om het concurrentievermogen van Belgische ondernemingen te vrijwaren, verbiedt de wet tot wijziging van d...

Read more

Ook in 2017 en 2018 blijft landingsbaan met onderbrekingsuitkeringen mogelijk vanaf 55 jaar
22/04/2017

Ook in 2017 en 2018 kunnen bepaalde werknemers die hun arbeidsprestaties verminderen in het kader van het tijdskrediet ein...

Read more

Plus de flexibilité dans le temps de travail et la carrière du personnel du secteur public
05/04/2017

Par un arrêté royal du 9 mars 2017, le gouvernement adopte une série de mesures visant à donner...

Plus de flexibilité dans le temps de travail et la carrière du personnel du secteur public Read more

LexGO Network