Trade Secrets: Belgium on its way to compliance
10/07/2018

Short refresher: on 8 June 2016, the European legislator adopted a new Trade Secrets Directive. Members States were supposed to implement this Directive by 9 June 2018. Belgium is not there yet but recently made an important step forward: a legislative proposal has been filed on 12 June 2018. Let us have a look at its cornerstones.

Key elements of the Belgian draft Trade Secrets Act

At the moment, the Belgian legal provisions relating to trade secrets are scattered into different pieces of legislation: the Employment Contracts Act, the Criminal Code and civil rules on tort law. The transposition of the Directive should permit a harmonisation of those provisions.

In Belgium, the choice has been made to not adopt an autonomous Trade Secrets Act, but rather to amend the Code of Economic Law, the Judicial Code and the Employment Contracts Act.

In short, we can already underpin the following:

  • The commercial courts shall have jurisdiction to deal with actions regarding the unlawful acquisition, use or disclosure of trade secrets (without prejudice to the Labour and Arbitration Tribunals’ jurisdiction), even if the parties are not businesses, and regardless of the amount of the claim;
  • A statute of limitation of five years applies to bringing a trade secrets action to court (this term starts running as from the day of discovery of the unlawful act and the identity of the alleged infringer);
  • The trade secret holder can request the court to adopt provisional measures. However, and this is new in Belgium, those provisional measures will be revoked if a procedure on the merits is not introduced within the term set out in the decision (or, in the absence of such term, within 20 business days or 31 calendar days as from the decision’s notification); and
  • Generally speaking, the civil remedies available to the trade secret holder are very similar to the ones available to the owners of intellectual property rights (despite the fact that trade secrets are not intellectual property rights per se).

Next steps and transitional provisions

The draft act is now pending with the Chamber of Representatives. Once adopted and published in the Belgian Official Gazette, the act shall apply to infringements occurring after its entry into force but also to infringements which occurred prior to that date, but persist after its entry into force. In case of legal proceedings already pending at the moment of the entry into force of the Trade Secrets Act, parties shall however not be entitled to invoke the new legislation.

Related : Loyens & Loeff CVBA ( Mr. Yves Van Couter ,  Ms. Stéphanie De Smedt ,  Ms. Charline Van Hoeck )

[+ http://www.loyensloeff.com]

Mr. Yves Van Couter Mr. Yves Van Couter
Partner
yves.van.couter@loyensloeff.com
Ms. Stéphanie De Smedt Ms. Stéphanie De Smedt
Associate
stephanie.de.smedt@loyensloeff.com
Ms. Charline Van Hoeck Ms. Charline Van Hoeck
Associate
charline.van.hoeck@loyensloeff.com

Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles Intellectual property law

Lastest articles Intellectual property law

Goed nieuws voor de houders van een Beneluxmerk. Vanaf 1 juni 2018 krijgt u meer rechten en dit z...
18/07/2018

Het Beneluxverdrag inzake de intellectuele eigendom ondergaat enkele ingrijpende wijzigingenwijzigingen. Een van de belang...

Read more

Bill on protection of trade secrets: Belgium catches up!
27/06/2018

The EU Directive 2016/943 of 8 June 2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets...

Read more

Red Sole Diary: how the story ends before the CJEU
21/06/2018

The Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) handed down an eagerly awaited decision in a dispute about...

Read more

CJEU rules that Louboutin's red sole trade mark is not a shape trade mark
18/06/2018

On 12 June 2018, the Court of Justice of the EU rendered its much-awaited judgement in the case about Louboutin’s re...

CJEU rules that Louboutin's red sole trade mark is not a shape trade mark Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Yves Van Couter

Out with the old, in with the new: Belgian Privacy Commission becomes “Belgian Data Protection Au...
28/12/2017

Reform of the Belgian Privacy Commission The General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 creates a new privacy reg...

Read more

Enough about personal data, what about (restrictions to) the free flow of “non-personal data” ?
23/11/2017

As part of its Digital Single Market strategy, the European Commission published on 13 September 2017 a proposal for ...

Read more

Data Protection Alert: 2017 – the year of data breach incidents: new attack targets health sector
27/07/2017

The digitalization of healthcare services is generally applauded, as it leads to increased efficiency, better quality of c...

Read more

GDPR - Sanctions for non-compliance
14/06/2017

One of the most discussed topics relating to the entering into force of the GDPR, are the administrative fines that may be...

Read more

Lastest articles by Ms. Stéphanie De Smedt

10 tips voor u & uw onderneming - Tip 1 : GDPR compliance is geen last, maar een opportuniteit!
19/06/2018

-  De GDPR is onvermijdelijk, maar het helpt om dit niet alleen als een last te zien. -  Bedrijven ondervinde...

Read more

Out with the old, in with the new: Belgian Privacy Commission becomes “Belgian Data Protection Au...
28/12/2017

Reform of the Belgian Privacy Commission The General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 creates a new privacy reg...

Read more

Enough about personal data, what about (restrictions to) the free flow of “non-personal data” ?
23/11/2017

As part of its Digital Single Market strategy, the European Commission published on 13 September 2017 a proposal for ...

Read more

Data Protection Alert: 2017 – the year of data breach incidents: new attack targets health sector
27/07/2017

The digitalization of healthcare services is generally applauded, as it leads to increased efficiency, better quality of c...

Read more

Lastest articles by Ms. Charline Van Hoeck

LexGO Network