Trade Secrets: Belgium on its way to compliance
10/07/2018

Short refresher: on 8 June 2016, the European legislator adopted a new Trade Secrets Directive. Members States were supposed to implement this Directive by 9 June 2018. Belgium is not there yet but recently made an important step forward: a legislative proposal has been filed on 12 June 2018. Let us have a look at its cornerstones.

Key elements of the Belgian draft Trade Secrets Act

At the moment, the Belgian legal provisions relating to trade secrets are scattered into different pieces of legislation: the Employment Contracts Act, the Criminal Code and civil rules on tort law. The transposition of the Directive should permit a harmonisation of those provisions.

In Belgium, the choice has been made to not adopt an autonomous Trade Secrets Act, but rather to amend the Code of Economic Law, the Judicial Code and the Employment Contracts Act.

In short, we can already underpin the following:

  • The commercial courts shall have jurisdiction to deal with actions regarding the unlawful acquisition, use or disclosure of trade secrets (without prejudice to the Labour and Arbitration Tribunals’ jurisdiction), even if the parties are not businesses, and regardless of the amount of the claim;
  • A statute of limitation of five years applies to bringing a trade secrets action to court (this term starts running as from the day of discovery of the unlawful act and the identity of the alleged infringer);
  • The trade secret holder can request the court to adopt provisional measures. However, and this is new in Belgium, those provisional measures will be revoked if a procedure on the merits is not introduced within the term set out in the decision (or, in the absence of such term, within 20 business days or 31 calendar days as from the decision’s notification); and
  • Generally speaking, the civil remedies available to the trade secret holder are very similar to the ones available to the owners of intellectual property rights (despite the fact that trade secrets are not intellectual property rights per se).

Next steps and transitional provisions

The draft act is now pending with the Chamber of Representatives. Once adopted and published in the Belgian Official Gazette, the act shall apply to infringements occurring after its entry into force but also to infringements which occurred prior to that date, but persist after its entry into force. In case of legal proceedings already pending at the moment of the entry into force of the Trade Secrets Act, parties shall however not be entitled to invoke the new legislation.

Related : Loyens & Loeff CVBA ( Mr. Yves Van Couter ,  Ms. Stéphanie De Smedt ,  Ms. Charline Van Hoeck )

[+ http://www.loyensloeff.com]

Mr. Yves Van Couter Mr. Yves Van Couter
Partner
yves.van.couter@loyensloeff.com
Ms. Stéphanie De Smedt Ms. Stéphanie De Smedt
Associate
stephanie.de.smedt@loyensloeff.com
Ms. Charline Van Hoeck Ms. Charline Van Hoeck
Associate
charline.van.hoeck@loyensloeff.com

Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles Intellectual property law

Lastest articles Intellectual property law

EU Parliament adopts new Copyright Directive
24/09/2018

On 12 September 2018, the European Parliament adopted a new draft Copyright Directive (the so called “Directive on C...

Read more

Le scraping est-il légal ?
14/09/2018

Le web scraping est aussi appelé « screen scraping », ou « harvesting »...

Read more

Droit d’auteur et Internet : la nouvelle directive est presque là
13/09/2018

Le Parlement européen nous a tenu en haleine tout l’été. Après une véritable guer...

Droit d’auteur et Internet : la nouvelle directive est presque là Read more

Parallel Trade: Rebranding of Generic Medicine to Originator Brand Name Constitutes Trade Mark In...
29/08/2018

On 12 April 2018, the Dutch-language Commercial Court of Brussels (the “Court”) gave judgment in a dispute bet...

Parallel Trade: Rebranding of Generic Medicine to Originator Brand Name Constitutes Trade Mark Infringement Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Yves Van Couter

Two Belgian Acts implementing / supplementing the GDPR adopted
03/09/2018

The process for the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) is occurring in two phas...

Read more

EU-US Privacy Shield on the chopping block?
27/08/2018

The EU – US Privacy Shield was adopted in July 2016 as a replacement of the Safe Harbor regime, which was struck dow...

Read more

Belgian rules on use of surveillance cameras revised
16/08/2018

On 21 March 2018, the Belgian Parliament adopted a law amending the Belgian Camera Act of 2007. The primary goal was to cr...

Read more

Blockchain and GDPR: is a clash really inevitable?
10/08/2018

Blockchain, considered to be the greatest technological innovation since the internet, is currently also one of the most d...

Read more

Lastest articles by Ms. Stéphanie De Smedt

Two Belgian Acts implementing / supplementing the GDPR adopted
03/09/2018

The process for the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) is occurring in two phas...

Read more

EU-US Privacy Shield on the chopping block?
27/08/2018

The EU – US Privacy Shield was adopted in July 2016 as a replacement of the Safe Harbor regime, which was struck dow...

Read more

Blockchain and GDPR: is a clash really inevitable?
10/08/2018

Blockchain, considered to be the greatest technological innovation since the internet, is currently also one of the most d...

Read more

EU and Japan agree on free flows of personal data – Will South Korea be next in line?
02/08/2018

On 17 July 2018, the European Union and Japan successfully concluded negotiations on the reciprocal finding of an adequate...

Read more

Lastest articles by Ms. Charline Van Hoeck

LexGO Network