CJEU renders important decision on the liability of online platforms in trade mark infringement cases

On 2 April 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) rendered a judgment (C-567/18) clarifying the potential liability of Amazon and other operators of online platforms for trade mark infringement. 

The Court was asked to rule on the question of whether Amazon had infringed Coty's trade mark rights by storing and shipping infringing bottles of ‘Davidoff Hot Water’ perfume, which were offered for sale on the site not by Amazon but by third-party sellers. In this regard, it should be noted that the perfume itself was genuine but had not been placed on the EU market with Coty's consent. 

The case related to a particular aspect of Amazon's activity, namely storing and shipping products offered for sale by third parties on Amazon’s platform, without knowledge of an infringement. 

The CJEU examined whether storage could be regarded as ‘use’ of a trade mark for the purposes of Article 9(1) and (2) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation 2017/1001 ("EUTMR") and, in particular, the ‘stocking’ of goods in order to offer or put them on the market (Art. 9(3)(b) EUTMR).

The Court answered this question in the negative:  

"In order for the storage of goods bearing signs identical, or similar to trade marks to be classified as ‘using’ those signs, it is also necessary for the economic operator providing the storage itself to pursue the aim referred to by those provisions, which is offering the goods or putting them on the market. Failing that, it cannot be concluded that the act constituting the use of the trade mark is carried out by that person, or that the sign is used in that person’s own commercial communication".

While it appears that the Court let Amazon off the hook in this instance, it is important to understand the scope of this decision. Indeed, the decision is expressly limited to the acts of storing and shipping infringing products offered for sale by a third party on the platform, without knowledge by the operator of the online platform of the infringement. Had Amazon stored the goods with the aim of offering or putting them on the market on its own behalf or used the trade mark in its own communications, it could have been held liable for direct trade mark infringement. 

In addition, while the Court found that Amazon should not be held directly liable for trade mark infringement under the EUTMR for warehousing activities performed on behalf of third parties, it may still incur indirect liability on other grounds. Indeed, the CJEU recalled that where an economic operator has enabled another operator to make use of a trade mark, its role must, as necessary, be examined with reference to other rules of law, namely the e-Commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) or the IP Enforcement Directive (2004/48), which are not affected by this judgment.

Related : NautaDutilh ( Mr. Tanguy de Haan ,  Mrs. Colombe de Callata├┐ )

[+ http://www.nautadutilh.com]

Mr. Tanguy de Haan Mr. Tanguy de Haan
Mrs. Colombe de Callata├┐ Mrs. Colombe de Callata├┐
Senior Associate

Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles European Law

Lastest articles European Law

EU Omnibus Directive: what is the impact of the consumer protection reform for traders? Some take...

Nearly one year ago, the EU Parliament adopted the directive No 2019/2161 (better known as the “Omnibus Di...

Read more

EIOPA outlines approach on product oversight and governance

EIOPA published a paper on its approach to product oversight and governance requirements for insurance distributors and ma...

EIOPA outlines approach on product oversight and governance Read more

A European passport for crowdfunding

At last, a European passport for crowdfunding! As from 10 November 2021, it will be possible for both new and existing cro...

A European passport for crowdfunding Read more

The EU digital finance package: unwrapping digitally fit rules for financial services

The European Commission is eager to accelerate the EU’s digital transition and to ensure EU leadership in the realm ...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Tanguy de Haan

The Court of Justice of the EU clarifies the assessment of position marks for services

The Court of Justice of the EU recently clarified the criteria to take into account when assessing the distinctive charact...

Read more

EU Copyright: lending out vehicles with radio receivers is not a ÔÇťcommunication to the publicÔÇŁ

On 2 April 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) rendered a judgment (C-753/18) ...

Read more

And if we installed surveillance cameras at work?

Can an employer that wishes to verify the productivity of its employees, that notes damage to its property and would like ...

Read more

Are Your Trade Marks Adequately Protected?

Every business uses signs to distinguish its goods or services on the market. These signs may take the form of words, name...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mrs. Colombe de Callata├┐

LexGO Network