News on cross-border financial services in Belgium post-Brexit
13/03/2019

We summarise the most important aspects of cross-border financial services post-Brexit contained in a draft bill submitted to Parliament and a communication by the FSMA in this respect.


Legislative & regulatory action

On 19 February 2019 a bill on the withdrawal of the UK from the European Union was submitted to Parliament. The bill enables the King to take certain (legislative) measures to ensure the continuity post-Brexit of, among other things, financial services contracts which are currently (i.e. prior to Brexit) in place between Belgian residents and UK financial institutions active in Belgium under the European passport. The FSMA has also issued a communication on the continuance of the provision of investment services and activities by UK investment firms and credit institutions in case of a hard Brexit. In the absence of a (Belgian) transitional regime, UK investment firms can, post-Brexit, either opt to establish an authorized branch in Belgium or notify the FSMA that they wish to provide cross-border investment services.


Access to Belgium for non-EEA investment firms

The possibility to provide, as a non-EEA investment firm, investment services on a cross-border basis was already included in the former Royal Decree of 20 December 1995 and has thus been a possibility for non-EEA investment firms to access the Belgian market for quite some time. The regime nevertheless contains some important restrictions.


Conditions

First, the FSMA can deny access to the Belgian market if the home country of the investment firm does not provide for equal market access for Belgian firms (the so-called 'reciprocity'). The FSMA has, however, clarified in its communication that in view of the announcement by the British government of the introduction of a temporary permissions regime for inbound passporting EEA firms, the reciprocity condition should be deemed to be fulfilled, as long as this temporary regime remains in force.

Second, in case a non-EEA firm wants to provide services on a cross-border basis in Belgium, it must limit the provision of such services to certain categories of investors, namely: (i) eligible counterparties within the meaning of MiFID (II), (ii) “per se” professional clients within the meaning of MiFID (II) and/or (iii) persons established in Belgium with the nationality of the home state of the firm concerned or of a state in which such firm has established a branch, provided the firm is, in its home state or in the state in which it has established a branch, subject to supervision that is equivalent to that to which investment firms governed by Belgian law are subject.


Notification

Subject to the above conditions, the cross-border access regime for non-EEA firms provides for a relatively straightforward notification procedure. The FSMA has now issued template notification forms for the purposes of the notification. It has also clarified that by way of the (prior) notification, firms are authorized to commence their activity. If the FSMA establishes that the conditions for the cross-border access regime are not met, it is entitled to oppose to the provision of the investment services at any time.


Existing contracts

However, the restriction under the cross-border access regime to certain categories of investors does not provide for a solution for the continuity of contracts concluded (prior to Brexit) with Belgian retail clients. This issue may be resolved by one of the measures the King is empowered to take on the basis of the aforementioned bill of 19 February 2019.


Eveline Hellebuyck

Related : Loyens & Loeff CVBA ( Mr. Marc Vermylen ,  Mrs. Eveline Hellebuyck )

Mr. Marc Vermylen Mr. Marc Vermylen
Managing Partner
Marc.vermylen@loyensloeff.com
Mrs. Eveline Hellebuyck Mrs. Eveline Hellebuyck
Senior Associate
eveline.hellebuyck@loyensloeff.com

Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles Financial law

Lastest articles Financial law

Bent u in orde met uw UBO-registratie? Deadline verstrijkt bijna…
18/09/2019

Tegen 30 september 2019 moeten alle Belgische rechtspersonen hun zogenaamde "UBO" registreren. In De Tijd van 30...

Bent u in orde met uw UBO-registratie? Deadline verstrijkt bijna… Read more

Updated FAQ clarifies that listed companies do not have to register their UBO in Belgium
31/07/2019

The Belgian AML Act does not provide an exemption for listed companies regarding the registration of their UBO. Accor...

Updated FAQ clarifies that listed companies do not have to register their UBO in Belgium Read more

Banker's oath and disciplinary regime
11/07/2019

An Act dated 22 April 2019 amends the Banking Act of 25 April 2014 on the status and supervision of credit institutions an...

Banker's oath and disciplinary regime Read more

Belgium requires listed companies to register their UBO
05/07/2019

The Belgian AML Act does not provide an exemption for listed companies regarding the registration of their UBO.

Belgium requires listed companies to register their UBO Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Marc Vermylen

New Belgian Pledge Act confirmed for 1 January 2018
28/09/2017

Today (26/09/2017), a Royal Decree was published confirming the entry into force of the new Belgian Pledge Act . The Belgi...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mrs. Eveline Hellebuyck

LexGO Network