The Court of Justice of the EU receives the first preliminary ruling on the EU Damages Directive
15/03/2018

A Portuguese court (Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa) has referred the first preliminary ruling request on Directive 2014/104 (“the EU Damages Directive”) to the Court of Justice of the EU. The reference of the case is C-637/17.

The main question referred by the Portuguese court aims at clarifying the applicability of the EU Damages Directive to proceedings instituted before the expiry of the Directive’s transposition period concerning facts that occurred prior to its publication.

The preliminary ruling has been referred in the context of an action for damages filed by Cogeco Group against Sport TV on the basis of articles 9 and 10 of the EU Damages Directive. The plaintiff founded its claims on the basis of a decision of the Portuguese Competition Authority declaring that Sport TV had abused its dominant position in the paid TV market between 2006 and 2011. The Decision was confirmed by Lisbon’s Court of Appeal in March 2015.

According to Article 498(1) of the Portuguese Civil Code, the right to bring an action for damages expires within 3 years as from the day in which the person concerned knew of its right to bring such an action. However, under Article 10 of the EU Damages Directive the right to bring an action for damages resulting from competition infringements expires 5 years after the person concerned learned of the conduct, the harm caused and the identity of the author of the infringement.

In the same line, article 9 of the EU Damages Directive establishes a non-rebuttable presumption regarding the existence of a Competition Law infringement if there is a final decision of a Competition Authority or a final judgment declaring such infringement. By contrast, article 623 of the Portuguese Procedural Code does not foresee such a presumption.

The facts underlying Cogeco’s claim occurred before the date of publication of the EU Damages Directive (i.e., 5 December 2014), and Cogeco’s claim was filed before 27 December 2016, date at which the transposition deadline of the Directive expired.

Hence, the Court of Justice of the EU will need to rule on whether it is possible to exclude the application of national provisions that clash with the EU Damages Directive regarding actions for damages exercised before the expiry of the Directive’s transposition period related to facts that took place before its publication.

If the question was to be replied positively, the Court of Justice has been asked to clarify whether it is possible to interpret and apply the national provisions in question in a way that is in line with the EU Damages Directive. If that is the case, the Portuguese Court has inquired whether it is possible for the claimant to invoke article 22 of the EU Damages Directive in proceedings concerning an action for damages instituted before a national court. Such article (i) prohibits the retroactive application of substantive provisions adopted by Member States in order to transpose the Directive and (ii) establishes that procedural national provisions adopted by Member States in order to transpose the Directive shall not apply to actions for damages brought before 26 December 2014 (i.e., the date of publication of the Directive).

Related : Gomez-Acebo & Pombo ( Mr. Miguel Troncoso-Ferrer )

Mr. Miguel Troncoso-Ferrer Mr. Miguel Troncoso-Ferrer
Partner
mtroncoso@gomezacebo-pombo.com

Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles Corporate law

Lastest articles Corporate law

Uiterlijk op 31 maart 2019 moeten alle uiteindelijke begunstigden van uw onderneming geregistreer...
21/12/2018

In de strijd tegen het witwassen van geld en terrorismefinanciering streeft de overheid maximale transparantie na. Daarom ...

Read more

Het UBO-register en de (i)vzw of stichting
17/12/2018

Op 30 juli 2018 werd een Koninklijk Besluit uitgevaardigd ter implementatie van het UBO-register. Dit KB treedt op 31 okto...

Het UBO-register en de (i)vzw of stichting Read more

Modernisation of the takeover rules
14/12/2018

The Takeover Bid Act, the Takeover Bid Decree and the Squeeze-out Decree have been amended recent...

Modernisation of the takeover rules Read more

Vernieuwing alom! Wat verandert er voor uw burgerlijke maatschap?
10/12/2018

Recent zijn diverse nieuwe wetten van kracht geworden die een impact kunnen hebben op de burgerlijke maatschap. De meeste ...

Vernieuwing alom! Wat verandert er voor uw burgerlijke maatschap? Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Miguel Troncoso-Ferrer

The Commission clears the acquisition of parts of Fox by Disney with commitments
29/11/2018

On 14 September 2018, Disney noti ed its proposed acquisition of certain parts of Fox’ business. Disney and Fox are ...

Read more

The European Commission fines Google EUR4.34 billion for abuse of dominance
03/08/2018

The European Commission has found that Google has been imposing illegal restrictions on Android device manufacturers and m...

Read more

New EU Regulation to ban unjustified geo-blocking in the internal mark
02/04/2018

Regulation 2018/302 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 February 2018 on addressing unjusti ed geo-blockin...

Read more

A new Belgian Code of Companies and Associations
19/03/2018

An important modification in the field of Belgian corporate law is now on track and it also concerns non-profit associatio...

Read more

LexGO Network